-
PI 3 and SE Workflow and Usability
Good day, PI-ers.
I’m using SE and would like to go to 3, provided I can get a better understanding of product usability. I’ve watched some YouTube videos and searched this forum and haven’t found what I am looking for.
My problem is this:
The effects are enormously varied and extremely numerous. They vary significantly in purposed application. Some will work well as a soft texture, others as flat out obnoxious object. Some are in between. In short, the libraries/emitters/particles are absolutely abundant and as such appear to be hard to manage. There are so many, that are so poorly organized and are so varied that artistic efficiency has a tough time flourishing. At this point, I open a library, scour through it, then save it as it’s original name plus some keywords, which so far isn’t all that efficient or helpful.
What I have:
Currently the libraries I have installed are, I believe, all of those available for SE. The names of the libraries are of a date format or some other miscellaneous label, and the items therein are also not entirely accurate as to their contents; and I’m sure that is the nature of an emitter (or whatever it’s called). It’s very hard to put a word on a visual.
What I’m looking for:
I know that I could be more productive, and use the product better, and be more interested in going pro, if the library that displays the emitters was more robust OR if I understood it all better. There’s some explosions here and there, some pixie dust in a few, some trailing smoke and fire in others, and some really silly moving/pulsing circles in others. I want a library or organizational tool which would allow me to easily:
– Choose an emitter for a project, OR
– Review emitters for creative thinking, OR
– Easily move my favorite emitters (after reviewing THEM ALL) to a single library, OR
– ?Any input on libraries, usability, simplifying the organization of the massive amount of effects will be greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance!