Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy PAL to NTSC conversion?

  • PAL to NTSC conversion?

    Posted by Phillr on June 14, 2005 at 9:54 pm

    Hi, I have a one hour tv show here that was shot in PAL, anamorphic. I copy/pasted the timeline into a DV NTSC timeline and rendered it out. The footage is sorta choppy when being viewed on my NTSC monitor. Looks sorta like a slight ghosting/drag of the video image due to the frame pulldown or something. Anybody know how to fix this? Maybe I didn’t convert the footage properly? Any simple solution? Fingers crossed….

    I’ve been looking at the Nattress filter. Looks very complicated and cumbersome to convert all the footage we have. Plus it costs money, unless someone’s able to lend it to me…

    Bryce Whiteside replied 20 years, 10 months ago 5 Members · 8 Replies
  • 8 Replies
  • Trinity Greer

    June 14, 2005 at 10:08 pm

    Goto https://www.nattress.com/ and buy his standards converter. Works great at a great price. $100us is cheaper than doing at a post house. Email him with issues I am sure he would address any reasonable concerns you have.

  • Phillr

    June 14, 2005 at 10:21 pm

    are there any other solutions? it looked like a very cumbersome method of using the filter. how is it applied? if i purchase it, how soon do i get it? i need to fix this problem asap/now.

  • Bryce Whiteside

    June 14, 2005 at 10:56 pm

    Create a circle with these three terms–BETTER, FASTER, CHEAPER–at 0 degrees, 120 degrees and 240 degrees. Draw a vector from the center of your circle to each terms.

    You can pick one or two, but not all three. The resultant vector of any two choices will be a compromise of those two.

    Welcome to the empirical world…
    Bryce

    PS Buy Nattress’s plug-in and have all the time or go to a posthouse and give them your money for a PAL to NTSC dub. Or spend anywhere from $2500 to $10000 for a realtime standards converter peice of broadcast terminal equipment.

    Don’t worry Mr. B. I have a cunning plan…

    PowerBook 1.67 Ghz ATI 9700 128 MB 2 GB
    Final Cut Pro HD
    DVD Studio Pro 3
    Motion

  • Phillr

    June 15, 2005 at 1:25 am

    Using the Nattress filter is a very cumbersome method if there’s alot of clips involved (my situation). But I guess I have no other option right now….

  • Jeff Boulton

    June 15, 2005 at 1:28 am

    Bryce:

    Your response to Phillip was a little snarky. He’s just looking for some assistance with an issue, and I know that he is well aware of the FREE-PERFECT-NOW rule. He probably has a nasty producer-type hanging over his shoulder pressing him to resolve the issue.

    If you want to entertain yourself by mocking people who are frustrated that is your choice, but I say give the poor fellow the benefit of the doubt. If you don’t have some honest and helpful response to his question about the complexity of using the suggested plugin then don’t waste his time responding in such a fashion.

    Jeff Boulton
    Executive Producer

    Dante Entertainment Group
    344 Dupont Street, Suite 202
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5R 1V9

    Tel: (416) 534-6728
    Fax: (416) 534-4792

    http://www.dante-ent.com

  • Graeme Nattress

    June 15, 2005 at 1:45 am

    I wish it wasn’t so, but there’s limits with what you can do inside FCP, and the Standards Conversion plugin goes up and over what was though possible.

    All I can suggest is that you look at the tutorial movies here for it’s operation:

    https://www.nattress.com/standardsConversionMovie.htm

    And either post here, or email me if you have any issues.

    Graeme

    http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects for FCP

  • Bryce Whiteside

    June 15, 2005 at 3:06 am

    phillr – Looks very complicated and cumbersome to convert all the footage we have. Plus it costs money, unless someone’s able to lend it to me…

    You have got to be kidding “Plus it costs, unless someone’s able to lend it to me…”. This is a very pointed mindset and on some forums he would have had his post deleted. Dancing warez are spinning above my head. If genuinely said this in good humor, I stand corrected–phillr?

    Jeff Boulton – If you don’t have some honest and helpful response to his question about the complexity of using the suggested plugin then don’t waste his time responding in such a fashion.
    …uh…where in this are there no alternatives.
    Bryce – PS Buy Nattress’s plug-in and have it–missing word correction–all the time or go to a posthouse and give them your money for a PAL to NTSC dub. Or spend anywhere from $2500 to $10000 for a realtime standards converter piece–spelling typo correction–of broadcast terminal equipment.

    phillr – I’ve been looking at the Nattress filter. Looks very complicated and cumbersome to convert all the footage we have. Plus it costs money, unless someone’s able to lend it to me…
    Maybe he was genuinely stressed for success, but it sounded like he walked into this forum with an attitude.

    If Grasshopper had recieved the suggestion from Trinity Greer instead of phillr – “it looked like a very cumbersome method of using the filter.”, perhaps I would have been a little more forgiving trying to watch Grasshopper snatch the pebble from the Zen master’s hand.

    Cheers,
    Mr. Cranky and not feeling too “PC” today…

    Don’t worry Mr. B. I have a cunning plan…

    PowerBook 1.67 Ghz ATI 9700 128 MB 2 GB
    Final Cut Pro HD
    DVD Studio Pro 3
    Motion

  • Bryce Whiteside

    June 15, 2005 at 4:10 am

    I know. He needs to snatch the pebble from a Shaolin Priest.
    https://www.shaolin-kung-fu-library.com/

    Inquiring minds…
    Bryce

    Don’t worry Mr. B. I have a cunning plan…

    PowerBook 1.67 Ghz ATI 9700 128 MB 2 GB
    Final Cut Pro HD
    DVD Studio Pro 3
    Motion

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy