Activity › Forums › Adobe Premiere Pro › Outputting 1080i sequences
-
Outputting 1080i sequences
Posted by Frank Cervarich on April 11, 2013 at 4:50 pmI use CS6 on a MacPro and have been working on a web series of late. I am at the point of (I have ten episodes in the can) wanting to have two things – a master of each episode and something that I can post on the web for same.
I’m not sure I have given you enough info but I am wondering –
What should I select as my options to create a high quality master?
What should I select as my options to create a copy for placing on the web that will be universally recognized but still have high quality?
Thanks for your input.
Ryan Holmes replied 13 years, 1 month ago 3 Members · 5 Replies -
5 Replies
-
Ryan Holmes
April 11, 2013 at 6:53 pm[Frank Cervarich] “What should I select as my options to create a high quality master?”
Are you laying this off to tape? Do want a digital file? How will you archive the digital file – LTO tape, hard disk, Blu-Ray data disc? I would probably use ProRes or DNxHD as my codec of choice (assuming Uncompressed isn’t an option), and then back that up however you deem appropriate – LTO, hard drive, etc. If you wan to compress it more heavily you could do a h.264 mp4 @ 100mbps or higher. Problem is that h.264 is a heavily compressed format and not an edit friendly format. But depending on what you’re doing it may be a worthy solution.
[Frank Cervarich] “What should I select as my options to create a copy for placing on the web that will be universally recognized but still have high quality? “
AME has presets in it for web video. Just look under the “Web Video” area for YouTube or Vimeo. Those are a good place to start. The most universally accepted format is a h.264 codec wrapped in a mp4 wrapper. Those files play on Windows/Mac, iProducts, Android, etc.
Ryan Holmes
http://www.ryanholmes.me
@CutColorPost -
Ivan Myles
April 11, 2013 at 7:14 pmRecommend H.264 with AAC audio at 320 kbps for web distribution. You might need to render multiple versions depending on requirements. Consider submitting high bitrate video to sites that re-render.
There are a few options for mastering. Commonly used codecs include ProRes, DNxHQ, PNG, and uncompressed RGBA (compressor = “None”). The QuickTime uncompressed 422 and AVI V210 YUV codecs maintain luma and chroma information, which is helpful if you need to make color corrections at a later date. (I’m not sure about ProRes, but the other codecs convert to RGB during encoding.) 10-bit varieties are preferred.
-
Frank Cervarich
April 11, 2013 at 7:53 pmRyan –
I wish I could say I was laying off to LTO or using the cloud BUT I still use hard drives, and they are non-RAID array type. I suppose that I would lean toward the Avid codec rather than the Quicktime one if I had to chose between the two.
What other items should be adjusted to get maximum quality based on your experience?
What about the soon arrival of H.265 in regard to a web codec? I notice that the mp4 that I get out of Premiere Pro does not play well on a Quicktime player but, of course, it does great on an Adobe Reader.
Thanks for the tips. Would welcome more.
-
Ivan Myles
April 11, 2013 at 8:08 pm[Frank Cervarich] “I notice that the mp4 that I get out of Premiere Pro does not play well on a Quicktime player”
Use the master file to render H.264 MP4 using QuickTime Pro.
-
Ryan Holmes
April 11, 2013 at 9:58 pm[Frank Cervarich] “What other items should be adjusted to get maximum quality based on your experience?”
Just remember that Quicktime is just a wrapper, like AVI or MXF. Quicktime, as a wrapper, can take virtually any codec – ProRes, DNxHD, h.264, Uncompressed, Motion JPEG, etc. So you can export out a Quicktime DNxHD file if you wanted to store that long term.
[Frank Cervarich] “BUT I still use hard drives”
You can do this….just make sure you spin them up every 3-6 months. Hard drives have to be spun and started occasionally in order to maintain working order.
[Frank Cervarich] “What about the soon arrival of H.265 in regard to a web codec? “
When it arrives, it looks to be a step up from h.264. But at this point it is only just now leaving the standardization stage. I don’t see it being widely adopted or implemented for another couple years. It took h.264 several years to finally move to ubiquity. I expect h.265 will get there, but if you’re doing files for the web today, h.264 is still you’re best bet.
You might have a look at Vimeo’s compression guidelines page. They have good tips and video walkthroughs for most every software: https://vimeo.com/help/compression
Ryan Holmes
http://www.ryanholmes.me
@CutColorPost
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up