-
OT: The Politics of Apple’s Evolution
[If you can’t help but take politics personally, please stay away.]
I’m a political junkie so I often see things in a political context and wanted to get y’alls take on a thought I had last night. Apple eclipsed Exxon intermittently last year as the world’s most profitable company, so the Occupy movement’s vigils for Steve Jobs last year provided the dictionary definition of irony. (Almost.)
Apple has enjoyed a special place among liberals. I remember years ago reading how Apple stores were a great place to meet liberal singles. Apple has enjoyed the image as the outsider, the upstart, the one who “Thinks Differently” and so forth. On top of that, creative professionals (musicians, photographers, filmmakers) all tend to be liberal as well. This has inoculated Apple to a large degree, much as the uber-rich inoculate themselves from the left by contributing heavily to liberal causes (Buffett, Soros), and uber-rich conservatives become targets by supporting conservative causes (Koch brothers). This was a lesson Bill Gates learned too late, I believe.
But now, Apple may be showing itself to not only be the most profitable, but the most profit driven company in the world, while at the same time demonstrating a remarkable lack of loyalty to the group that kept the company afloat before the iPod came along.
So is Apple’s ‘Most Favored Company’ status at risk? Will their environmental initiatives be enough, or will Apple start becoming a Walmart sized target?
Thanks in advance for your thoughtful, sober analysis.