Old dogs new tricks

[Walter Soyka]

[Bill Davis] “Does this mean you see the “or Not” appendage as calling into question the value of the thing it’s attached to in a clearly negative way? Imagine that.”

The “Or Not” is interesting. You get to choose how it offends you!

You can either take offense because the title suggests that FCP X is so horrid that any other product might be better, or you take offense because the title uniquely recognizes FCP X and implies that no other product is even worth acknowledging by name.

(Personally, I think the title more or less accurately reflects the FCP-centricity of this forum. There was a choice that nearly all of us here had to make a few years back: do we upgrade from FCP7 to FCP X, Or Not?)

Walter Soyka
Designer & Mad Scientist at Keen Live [link]
Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
@keenlive   |   RenderBreak [blog]   |   Profile [LinkedIn]

[Andrew Kimery]

[Walter Soyka] “(Personally, I think the title more or less accurately reflects the FCP-centricity of this forum. There was a choice that nearly all of us here had to make a few years back: do we upgrade from FCP7 to FCP X, Or Not?)”

There many people still using 7 so there are lots of choices yet to come.