Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy New Mac Pro 2.26 vs previous Mac Pro 3.0

  • Glenn Fisher

    March 12, 2009 at 3:15 pm

    I don’t have any information to back this up with, but I would doubt it. Sure, there will be a little bit of a speed boost with the new processors, but I don’t think it would be that significant.

  • Shane Ross

    March 12, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    Sure it is…

    https://www.barefeats.com/nehal03.html

    Breaks the MEGAHERTZ MYTH…

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Michael Sacci

    March 12, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    I think there is A LOT of speed under the hood that is waiting to be unleashed, we just need software to take advantage of it. I think, think year we will see the software keep a big step forward performance wise. At least I hope we do.

  • Chris Borjis

    March 12, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    someone doing a review of benchmarking mentioned if
    you are budgeting between the fastest quad or the slowest octo,
    your best performance right now would be the fastest quad
    since the slowest octo on non-multi-core enabled apps (everything but compressor at this point lol)
    will be slightly slower than the quad core.

    a lot of people don’t realize, the more cores you have, there is a little
    more overhead for each core before you get to the performance gain.
    4 cores doesn’t mean 4x speed increase, but more like 3.1x or maybe a bit less.

    with intel spouting off to everyone to get there butts in gear with multi-thread
    and multi-cpu apps though, that should help quite a bit.

  • Sean Oneil

    March 13, 2009 at 5:49 am

    [Glenn Fisher] “I don’t have any information to back this up with, but I would doubt it. Sure, there will be a little bit of a speed boost with the new processors, but I don’t think it would be that significant.”

    You’re not the first person to assume this, and I honestly don’t get it. By your logic, wouldn’t a 2.7ghz PowerMac G5 be faster than a 2.6ghz Mac Pro?

    These new chips are a big bump, and will only get faster with newer software.

    Sean

  • Russell Lasson

    March 13, 2009 at 5:56 am

    [Sean ONeil] “By your logic, wouldn’t a 2.7ghz PowerMac G5 be faster than a 2.6ghz Mac Pro? “

    And doesn’t PowerMac suggest it would have… well… more “Power” than a Mac Pro? Just a thought.

    -Russ

    Russell Lasson
    Universal Post
    Ridgeline Digital Cinema Mastering
    Salt Lake City, UT

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy