Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › New Mac Pro 2.26 vs previous Mac Pro 3.0
-
New Mac Pro 2.26 vs previous Mac Pro 3.0
Posted by Christopher Tay on March 12, 2009 at 2:41 pmHi,
Anyone knows if the new Mac Pro dual quadcore 2.26 is as fast as the previous dual quadcore 3.0 ?
-chrispy
Russell Lasson replied 17 years, 1 month ago 7 Members · 6 Replies -
6 Replies
-
Glenn Fisher
March 12, 2009 at 3:15 pmI don’t have any information to back this up with, but I would doubt it. Sure, there will be a little bit of a speed boost with the new processors, but I don’t think it would be that significant.
-
Shane Ross
March 12, 2009 at 3:25 pmSure it is…
https://www.barefeats.com/nehal03.html
Breaks the MEGAHERTZ MYTH…
Shane
GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def -
Michael Sacci
March 12, 2009 at 4:17 pmI think there is A LOT of speed under the hood that is waiting to be unleashed, we just need software to take advantage of it. I think, think year we will see the software keep a big step forward performance wise. At least I hope we do.
-
Chris Borjis
March 12, 2009 at 4:40 pmsomeone doing a review of benchmarking mentioned if
you are budgeting between the fastest quad or the slowest octo,
your best performance right now would be the fastest quad
since the slowest octo on non-multi-core enabled apps (everything but compressor at this point lol)
will be slightly slower than the quad core.a lot of people don’t realize, the more cores you have, there is a little
more overhead for each core before you get to the performance gain.
4 cores doesn’t mean 4x speed increase, but more like 3.1x or maybe a bit less.with intel spouting off to everyone to get there butts in gear with multi-thread
and multi-cpu apps though, that should help quite a bit. -
Sean Oneil
March 13, 2009 at 5:49 am[Glenn Fisher] “I don’t have any information to back this up with, but I would doubt it. Sure, there will be a little bit of a speed boost with the new processors, but I don’t think it would be that significant.”
You’re not the first person to assume this, and I honestly don’t get it. By your logic, wouldn’t a 2.7ghz PowerMac G5 be faster than a 2.6ghz Mac Pro?
These new chips are a big bump, and will only get faster with newer software.
Sean
-
Russell Lasson
March 13, 2009 at 5:56 am[Sean ONeil] “By your logic, wouldn’t a 2.7ghz PowerMac G5 be faster than a 2.6ghz Mac Pro? “
And doesn’t PowerMac suggest it would have… well… more “Power” than a Mac Pro? Just a thought.
-Russ
Russell Lasson
Universal Post
Ridgeline Digital Cinema Mastering
Salt Lake City, UT
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up
