Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums VEGAS Pro New laptop – How’s this look?

  • New laptop – How’s this look?

    Posted by Mike Allgeier on August 25, 2011 at 6:35 pm

    I thought I had posted this last night but I must have been more tired than I thought…

    My 4-5 year old HP HDX 16 (2.6GHz Intel Core Duo, 4GB RAM, 320GB HDD) has been acting like it’s about to go out on me so I’m looking for a new laptop to edit on with Vegas (10e) and Sound Forge (7). I’ve just about decided on a Sony Vaio VPCF2290X 2D unit. Here’s the specs on it:

    – Intel® Core™ i7-2630QM quad-core processor (2.0GHz) with Turbo Boost up to 2.90GHz
    – Genuine Windows® 7 Professional 64-bit
    – 16.4″ 2D Full HD LCD display (1920×1080) with LED backlight
    – NVIDIA® GeForce® GT 520M (512MB VRAM) dedicated graphics
    – CD/DVD player / burner
    – 640GB (7200rpm) hard drive
    – 8GB (4GBx2) DDR3-SDRAM-1333
    – Large lithium-ion battery (7500mAh)

    It has a Firewire port on it but not an ESATA. I use USB drives right now so that’s not a big deal. And I can hook my Presonus Firestudio up to it too so that’s good.

    So, what are the opinions here? Does this look like a solid machine?

    Thanks,

    Mike

    HP HDX16
    Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz
    320GB HDD
    4GB RAM
    Sound Forge 7
    Vegas Pro 10
    Presonus Firestudio

    Ken Mitchell replied 14 years, 8 months ago 5 Members · 5 Replies
  • 5 Replies
  • John Rofrano

    August 25, 2011 at 6:56 pm

    Yea, that looks like a solid machine. It should be fine. Let us know how it performs when you get it.

    ~jr

    http://www.johnrofrano.com
    http://www.vasst.com

  • Ken Mitchell

    August 25, 2011 at 7:08 pm

    USB 3.0 on the laptop? could be a really plus if you have it.

  • Dave Haynie

    August 25, 2011 at 7:33 pm

    I’d probably look for USB 3.0 these days if I could get it… nearly as fast as eSATA, but way more useful. Not a deal breaker, but that would be on my list.

    The GPU is a lower-end dedicated graphics unit… better than a shared-memory GPU like the Intels, but it’s not for serious 3D gaming. That product number (GT520M) is either based on a GF108 core with 128-bit private memory bus, 1200MHz internal, or a GC119 core with 64-bit private memory bus and 1480MHz internal clock. Here’s the Notebook Check page on it: https://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GT-520M.43104.0.html

    It should be fine as a video accelerator… it has 48 unified shader cores, and can accelerate at least two simultaneous 1080p decodes. I have a GeForce 8400M in my laptop, which has only sixteen of the nVidia older stream processors, and even with just a dual-core 2.4GHz Core2, it can decode a 1080/60p stream in realtime. Never tried two, but it does do at least three 6Mb/s 1080/24p streams simultaneously (part of a networking demo I ran a few weeks ago). The CPU on mine is not fast enough to do this without GPU acceleration.

    If we had reasonable GPU acceleration in Vegas, or it was known to be coming, I might hold out. But at this point in time, that’s a big unknown. That GPU should be fast enough to be a big help on things that use OpenGL like some of the Boris BCC7 plug-ins, if you ever use that stuff.

    CPU, memory, and screen are close to the best you can get on a reasonable laptop these days (sure, there are some totally nutter machines built for gamers that use desktop chips and essentially have no useful battery life).

    -Dave

  • Kevin O’kelly

    August 29, 2011 at 3:58 am

    That video card seems underpowered for an i7 CPU.

    I have an Acer Laptop. AMD 970N quad 2.2GHz/6650M video. it’s well balanced.
    30% slower than my 965×4 desktop with dual MSI6850 video cards.
    But this laptop is dual purpose. I only paid $630 from newegg. Save money buy another in a year or two. I sold my old one for $250 and it was 3 years old. fleabay is wonderful.

    I build our desktops. at least one a year. Just remember to try and research benchmarks for your application. Each cpu can perform better at some tasks than others. Most of the time you do get faster when you spend more money but verify the application.

    good luck.

  • Ken Mitchell

    August 29, 2011 at 3:10 pm

    Usb 3 is actually much faster that esata

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy