In a number of ways, the old adage that you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t force it to drink might have some application here.
Under what circumstances does the project now “look great?”
If the finished project has never been technically evaluated, it cannot be accepted for broadcast. That has to be done under controlled conditions and there are legal requirements. Its an FCC thing, and that just covers the values that you might intend to transmit over the public airwaves. Whether those are good or not, or will be reproduced as intended depends on conforming with a standard set of values defined by a number of international regulatory bodies — SMPTE, CCIR, IBC… the intention is to try to set up a transmission pipeline where a set of numerical values is translated in consumers’ homes, which are utterly chaotic, so you really need to start out at least somewhere in the ballpark. Perfectly in conformance would be best… and that is a challenging thing to do. Not all displays are equal — that takes some deliberate intervention to achieve, and there are a number of manufacturers that have devoted a ton of effort and investment to try to provide. That is the difference between a grade-qualified display and any old thing you can pick up at Costco.
If you can’t say exactly where your black levels are sitting… you don’t know. They’re not “okay.” They will likely be wrong, its not something that can be determined by eye… and a QA will reveal that instantly — then it will start getting expensive to fix. Its better to be right, out of the gate, and defend-ably so.
jPo
“I always pass on free advice — its never of any use to me” Oscar Wilde.