-
Nattress Vs DVfilm
Hi all,
I was wondering if anyone has any opinion over which is the ‘better’ standards converter – the Nattress plug-in for FCP or the DVfilm’s Atlantis application.
Nattress’ converter costs half of what DVFilm’s does, is this indicative of quality?
Has anyone used both and come up with an opinion? Nattress seems to be the most well-used (or the most mentioned anyway – possibly because of price).
Is Compressor as good as the above? or is a dedicated converter the way to go?
Thanks so much!
will
-
2 Replies
-
I’ve only used Nattress and it’s always worked very well. I’ve read threads where people have rated it better than Compressor. I’ve no experience with DVFilm.
John
MacPro 8-core 2.8GHz 8 GB RAM OS 10.5.5 QT7.5.5 Kona 3 Dual Cinema 23 ATI Radeon HD 3870, 24″ TV-Logic Monitor, ATTO ExpressSAS R380 RAID Adapter, PDE enclosure with 8-drive 6TB RAID 5
FCS 2 (FCP 6.0.5, Comp 3.0.5, DVDSP 4.2.1, Color 1.0.3)Pro Tools HD w SYNC IO, Yamaha DM1000, Millennia Media HV-3C, Neumann U87, Schoeps Mk41 mics, Genelec Monitors, PrimaLT ISDN
-
[John Fishback] ” I’ve read threads where people have rated it better than Compressor”
Most Compressor conversions miss the most important setting, nmely intelligent use of the Frame Controls tab. IMHO this method writes the best conversions
Cheers
Alexander
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up