Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy mxo and eye-one

  • mxo and eye-one

    Posted by Robert Buncher on August 10, 2008 at 11:10 pm

    I am asking this question on this form as I believe that Shane Ross and possibly others use the mxo in conjunction with the eye-one.

    I just recently purchased an mxo and am just slightly confused. From my reading of the mxo manual I believe I should do the primary calibration of my secondary monitor while it is attached to the mxo. After that I use the mxo’s calibration tools.

    The problem I have is that the eye-one only calibrates the primary monitor. I have connected the ACD to my MacbookPro via the mxo. If I change the arrangement of the displays and make the ACD the primary display so that the eye-one can calibrate it, the mxo will not see the ACD as it only works on the secondary display.

    So, instead, I connected the ACD directly to the MacBookPro and calibrated with the eye-one. Then I reconnected the ACD via the mxo and finished the calibration process using the mxo tools.

    This does not seem correct to me and, also, the ACD appears much too bright while in master mode via the mxo.

    Any ideas about this?

    Thanks,

    Bob

    MacbookPro 2.33 2gb os 10.4.11
    FCP 5.1.4 After Effects Bootcamp XPpro

    Jon Hiseman replied 17 years, 6 months ago 3 Members · 5 Replies
  • 5 Replies
  • Shane Ross

    August 11, 2008 at 12:19 am

    I first calibrated the monitor with the MXO not attached. Before I even had the MXO. When I added the MXO to the mix, then things were fine. But to tell you the truth, you don’t need to calibrate the monitor with anything like the Eye2One or Spyder first. That is mainly to make sure your monitor works with still photography and matches that way. The MXO calibration tools alone do what is needed.

    I used the SPYDER when the MXO first came out. It didn’t have calibration tools, you just got the image and that was what you lived with. It was close, but not quite there. When they released the new version with calibration…golden. No need for the calibration software.

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Robert Buncher

    August 11, 2008 at 2:28 am

    Thanks Ross. I am puzzled by the look of the footage in mxo master view.

    The footage I am working with was shot very low on the waveform. Just lows and midtones with almost no hightlights and that is how it looks in the FCP canvas. When I switch over to mxo master view the footage looks pushed, very light and noisy. This puzzles me.

    I believe I have calibrated my bars correctly in mxoland and don’t understand why this footage looks so blownout.

    Bob

    MacbookPro 2.33 2gb os 10.4.11
    FCP 5.1.4 After Effects Bootcamp XPpro

  • Shane Ross

    August 11, 2008 at 2:58 am

    Tough to say if you properly calibrated it unless I see it in person. Either what you saw in the viewfinder and in the Canvas is not what you REALLY shot (not uncommon, those can be way off), or you are not properly calibrated.

    https://www.lafcpug.org/faqwiki/index.php/LAFCPUG:_Getting_Started_FAQs#How_do_I_calibrate_my_broadcast_monitor.3F

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Robert Buncher

    August 11, 2008 at 3:13 am

    Thanks Ross.
    I’ll check my calibration again. When we shot we used both the macbookpro and a small panasonic hd lcd field monitor to check image and waveform.
    Bob

    MacbookPro 2.33 2gb os 10.4.11
    FCP 5.1.4 After Effects Bootcamp XPpro

  • Jon Hiseman

    November 7, 2008 at 12:07 pm

    I have the same kind of problem. I am working on a music DVD, shot in HDV at a venue where no colors are natural due to the theatre lighting. My eventual release will be in DVD.
    I have a MacPro and 2x ACD/ second display via MXO
    Its easy to color correct on the canvas but when I switch to the MXO output its rather like working in glue and the color is slightly washed out and overall lighter.
    So I made a test DVD (via ProRes) and play it back on the new Pioneer 50″ 5090 KURO screen via the latest upscaling Pioneer DVD player and receiver. It looks EXACTLY the same as the MXO playback, color and brightness wise.
    So I then look at the DVD in Apple’s DVD player on the second monitor and it still looks EXACTY the same.
    In away I’m coming at this from a different direction – in view of the fact that I find color correcting using via the MXO quite notchy how can I set up the normal canvas output to roughly agree with what I am seeing via the MXO and Pioneer Screen. If I accept that the MXO output is correct why is the canvas so wrong?
    Is there a way to put a specific filter on the whole project (or on every clip) and then globally remove it but nothing else before checking via the MXO and exporting?
    Thanks
    jonh

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy