Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › Multiclip subcliping/marking or lack there of workarounds?
-
Multiclip subcliping/marking or lack there of workarounds?
Posted by Christian Kinnard on February 24, 2007 at 1:17 amAnyone have a good workflow to getting around FCP’s inability to mark or subclip on a multiclip. I have a ton if interviews most in clips of 30 min with an A and B cam. The is a feature, not a time of day program. My process is to mark the A cam with my selects, drop it in a timeline with the B cam and make the cuts. Then I grab the selects, drop them into a bin and multiclip.
If anyone has a good/better workflow I would love to hear it.
Thanks,
ChristianDavid Lewis replied 17 years, 11 months ago 3 Members · 3 Replies -
3 Replies
-
Nick Meyers
February 24, 2007 at 2:45 pmmark-up the A cam.
to make life easier, get all the markers over onto the B-cam.
make the multiclip.then work from that.
2 ways to copy markers from A to B:
1)
put A in timeline,
open B in viewer.
find common sync point on both.
gang viewer & canvas
go to fist marker in timeline clip
Q to move to viewer
M to mark
Q to move to canvas
Shift down arrow to move to next markerrepeat
Q, M, Q, down arow
2)
mark-up A, put in timeline,
put B on V2, and sync to A
Select all, park at head of timeline
Down arrow, (move to next marker)
M ad markerrepeat
Down arrow, M
when done drag marked up B cam to browser,
delete un-marked version.
make multiclipneither of these will copy any marker info across,
but it will make navigating a bit easiernick
-
Christian Kinnard
February 24, 2007 at 11:07 pmGreat Nick. I was doing something close to the second option, but not exactly, this helps alot. Thanks so much.
Christian
-
David Lewis
May 28, 2008 at 2:10 amI’m a documentary producer disappointed by the inability of FCP 5.1.4 to make subclips out of multiclps. I started cutting my most recent project thinking it could. For my first three-camera interview, I synced up all three cameras and made it into one long multiclip for screening and making selects. When I discovered I couldn’t make subclips from multi-clips, I decided to just blade out the portions I wanted, and copy-and-paste them into a new sequence. So far so good: They still act like multiclips.
After I had selected about two dozen passages of varying lengths, I realized they all had the same name so I couldn’t tell them apart. I decided to rename them. For each (multi)clip, I made it an independent clip and then renamed it in the item properties field. But then I wanted to put them all in one bin to help me arrange them. But when I dragged them into a bin, they all appeared with the same name again (i.e., the name they had before I renamed them.) So my question is, is this process going to work for me down deeper in the workflow? When I need to transfer it to a new workstation, for post-production or whatever, or export and EDL or XML, will it screw up things and I’ll have to start from scratch again?
I’ve searched the threads here and at Apple, and while I see others are having the same issues, I didn’t find a solution other than to go back to making my selects first, on the A camera, and then syncing up manually with the other cameras and stacking them, bite by bite, on the timeline. I’ve done this before (I’ve even used pen-and-scissors on the transcripts!) but I thought the multiclip was supposed to be and would be more efficient — AND allow me to see the different angles at the same time so I can choose the best shots in real time instead of going back and forth by blading out one video track or disabling another.
I’m finding it hard to believe that I’ve stumbled across a solution that so many with more experience have not found, so I thought I’d throw it out here to see what the possible issues are.
Without such a solution, it seems the multiclip function is only good for “live” cutting (since I have no experiecne with features I won’t comment on how it works in that scenario.) I’ve seen comments to that affect on the discussion boards — is that the consensus? I’d rather know now, at the beginning of this project, then find out down the road.Thanks!
Dave
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up