Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro multicam stacks everything in a pile

  • multicam stacks everything in a pile

    Posted by Hoss Wuerslin on August 1, 2012 at 12:01 am

    Hey out there;
    did a search; can’t see where this has been talked about.

    Doing my first multicam. Followed the tutorials put out by Steve and Mark at Macbreak.
    3 Camera shoot; all the same camera – jvc prohd
    Sinc by sound

    when you shoot on this camera for say an hour, it makes say 5 clips. So i selected all the clips from the three cameras, made the multicam clip, opened it up and saw all the clips pile on top of each other.

    EVEN the clips from say camera 1, were pile on top of each other! They weren’t even laid out in a straight line. So i had 15 clips from three cameras all pile high like pancakes.

    I tried importing folders as keyword collections, renamed all clips in say camera one folder to, “camera one”, did same with other camera folders, tried again…

    Pancakes.

    I know i’m doing this wrong.
    why can’t FCPX taks the clips from each camera and line them up and then why can’t it sinc from sound.

    Please help.

    Hoss

    Bret Williams replied 13 years, 9 months ago 3 Members · 5 Replies
  • 5 Replies
  • Bret Williams

    August 1, 2012 at 2:42 am

    How are you syncing them? You need to label the cameras in the inspector. That, TC, or audio has to sync them. Do you have an audio file to sync them to? Or just each other?

  • Bill Davis

    August 1, 2012 at 4:04 am

    [hoss wuerslin] “I know i’m doing this wrong.
    why can’t FCPX taks the clips from each camera and line them up and then why can’t it sinc from sound.

    Please help.

    Hoss

    A) it can.
    B) it’s not a simple or trivial tool.
    C) everyone does things a little bit differently, so your workflow may be making it harder or easier than it needs to be – which is something you’re going to have to figure out for yourself.

    Generally. If you’re shooting double system, then you should make compound clips syncing the sound and visuals first. ID each take and select the camera shot and sound take and use X’s Syncronize facility to make a sync compound. Then go in to that compound and kill the camera mic to leave just the good sound.

    I don’t know that particular camera, but if it’s broken takes are contiguous, I’d keyword each part so you can assemble each continuous take in the Event Browser.

    This way you’ll end up with continuous camera angles with good sound marked for easy timeline arrangement in Multicam.

    Then bring those into X’s Multicam area – arrange and post switch your project.

    That’s one possible workflow out of a hundred, and I might be mistaking what you’re starting with, and if so, bets are off.

    But it’s one way to approach what I think you’re describing.

    “Before speaking out ask yourself whether your words are true, whether they are respectful and whether they are needed in our civil discussions.”-Justice O’Connor

  • Bret Williams

    August 1, 2012 at 3:56 pm

    To expand: to make sure all the clips from the same camera come out on the same layer in the multicam editor you need to make sure that in the inspector, basic view, the “Camera Name” field is filled out. You can highlight all the Cam 1 clips at once if I remember right, and type a camera name into that field. Do that before you make the multicam clip, any breaks in a camera get lined up on the same layer.

    If you’re choosing “use audio for synchronization” which it sounds like you are, the clips obviously need to have fairly decent audio that the waveforms can be matched up.

    I don’t think the app gives a darn what your keyword collections are or what you’ve named the files.

  • Hoss Wuerslin

    August 1, 2012 at 6:10 pm

    That nailed it Bret!
    I was not putting in the angle name in the inspector; I was putting it just on the clips.
    You are like a god to me now.
    Thank you so much.

    Hoss

  • Bret Williams

    August 1, 2012 at 9:51 pm

    My inspector says camera name, but I think we’re talking about the same thing. My first round of multicam ended up with long interviews. Each time the b camera or a camera had to stop or switch cards, the new clip was on another layer. Then I read or saw a post that you have to tell FCP the camera name so it groups them together on the same layer. Glad it worked for ya. Worked for me.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy