Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Blackmagic Design Multibridge Extreme and CalDigit S2VR Pro

  • Multibridge Extreme and CalDigit S2VR Pro

    Posted by Margus Voll on August 8, 2006 at 10:01 pm

    Hi.

    Will S2VR be sufficent for HD with Multibridge Extreme or is this just hype?
    I do not need distributed content at the moment and price seems OK.

    Optional would be to buy 3ware sata II controller for 12 or 16 drives
    and big case for my machine with 10 places for HDD.
    3ware claims 800 MB/s RAID 5 reads and 380 MB/sec RAID 5 writes.
    In raid 0 it would be even more meybe.

    It is not too much for me to build system by my own.

    What do you think ?

    Margus.

    Margus Voll replied 19 years, 9 months ago 3 Members · 7 Replies
  • 7 Replies
  • Bob Zelin

    August 9, 2006 at 12:27 am

    This is my stupid opinion. I have (foolishly) declined for the moment to try the CalDigit S2VR, because it is a few pennies more than the other SATA solutions on the market currently (so my statements here might be stupid ) – but the RAID 0 Sonnet Fusion 500P – which uses the same damn 5 Hitachi or Seagate SATA II drives, can only do write speeds of 170mb/sec, which is NOT FAST ENOUGH for 10 bit uncompressed HD-SDI. You really need 220mb/sec at least (and faster) – so more than 5 drives (like 8-10 drives) will do this – but 5 drives won’t do it. (You do get read speeds of 220 mb/sec – but you DO have to record this stuff, somehow !!!!!!).

    If CalDigit (with their RAID 1+0) can do these speeds, then I have no idea of how they are doing it – but I don’t see how they can get 220mb/sec with only 5 drives. For reference to check my stupidity, look at http://www.barefeats.com and http://www.amug.org for studies in SATA drive speeds. My comments are solely based on my own personal experiences, and do not reflect what the CalDigit can or cannot do.

    Please remember – there is a big difference between being able to do it – and do it reliably, so you can actually get thru a job.

    bob Zelin

  • Margus Voll

    August 9, 2006 at 7:15 am

    Hi.

    My problem is that i can build my self even 16 drives unit
    with 3ware.
    It has web based UI wich also sends messages with email and so on.
    So lets say 8 drives in mirror with 8 drives raid 0.
    It should give pretty decent speed as claimed.
    Optional is to use 750 GB seagate drives. In theory 6 TB mirrored.

    Maybe guys in BM have tested 3ware PCIe new controllers.

    Margus.

  • Miles Blow

    August 9, 2006 at 12:42 pm

    Hi Bob…. have you tried adding an additional fusion box?…It word be great to hear(real world performaces)of how much faster it would run overall with two boxes running with 5 drives in each.(a seller here in Oz said it would double perforamace….Can you see that happenning?…If so thats what we are getting!!

    thanks
    Miles

  • Bob Zelin

    August 9, 2006 at 9:31 pm

    yes – two boxes with 10 drives – all stripped together – will give you fast enough performance for uncompressed HD. Please remember that this means that you cannot have 2 seperate volumes of 5 drives each. You must use Apple Disk Utility (or Microsoft Disk Manager – someone caught me last time, when I forgot this !) to stripe ALL THE DRIVES RAID 0.

    I have never tried the 3Ware. The popular SATA controllers in the US now are the Sonnet and the Firmtek (and the firmtek currently does not support Port Multiplication).

    Bob Zelin

  • Margus Voll

    August 9, 2006 at 9:48 pm

    I try to talk to local 3ware importer.
    Some friends of mine use 3ware on large web servers
    with big load.

    What does BM guys think of 3ware on PCIe?

    Margus.

  • Margus Voll

    August 14, 2006 at 12:30 pm

    Hi.

    Now I have to appologise my stupidity.
    I visited BM website and saw 3ware controller as supported.

    So I have my question cleared now. 🙂

    Margus.

  • Margus Voll

    August 17, 2006 at 6:25 am

    So we could assume that when two 10 disk units are “combined” as one acting as 10+10 mirror it should be kind of killer with its 5 TB and also mirrored at the same time?

    Margus.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy