Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Avid Media Composer more cores or faster processors

  • more cores or faster processors

    Posted by James Marshall on November 17, 2011 at 7:13 pm

    Hi
    I am moving back to Avid from FCP and I find myself needing a new edit workstation. I eagerly look forward to MC 6 and the Blackmagic Ultra studio.
    Which is better for MC 5.5 or 6 having more cores say Macpro with 8 core (2.64 ghz) or 12 core (2.66ghz ) or having an HP z400 with 4 or 6 core 3.4ghz processors?

    Any thoughts?

    Cheers James

    James Marshall replied 14 years, 6 months ago 3 Members · 5 Replies
  • 5 Replies
  • Jules Bodenstein

    November 18, 2011 at 10:25 am

    My gut feeling would be that processing speed is more important than number of cores however to make sure the system is future-proofed for as long as possible I would go with the 6 core HP z400.
    Its a very interesting question and I like know the opinion of other members on this.

    Gaz

    Gaz Evans

    Workflow Technician
    The diROOM
    https://www.diROOM.com

  • Jeff Greenberg

    November 19, 2011 at 2:34 am

    For MC 6? Now that it’s 64 bit? I’d say lots of ram and more cores – but the example you gave was apples and oranges (HPs.) Pick more cores from the most modern Chip.

    Best,

    Jeff G

    Certified Master Trainer | Adobe, Apple, Avid
    ————
    You should follow me (filmgeek) on twitter. I promise to be nice.
    New! FCPX DSLR workflows; What’s new in Media Comopser 6; Full Media Composer 6 basics from macProVideo.com
    Come see me speak at the Government Video Expo Nov 30 – Dec 1; Seminar link here
    My book (with Richard Harrington and Robbie Carman)- An Editor’s Guide to Adobe Premiere Pro
    Lynda.com – Compressor Essentials 3.5 and 4
    Contact me through my Website

  • James Marshall

    November 19, 2011 at 2:09 pm

    Thanks for the thoughts guys, but I am still puzzling over the processor speed differences between the apples and oranges. Is this because the measure the processor speed differently?

    It seems that the suggestion is to get the fastest processors you can afford in the greatest numbers.
    The price difference between the HP z400 with 6 cores running at 3.3ghz (£1800) and the apple with 6 cores running at 3.3ghz is (£2600) is quite steep.
    Which is better for Avid MC5.5 or 6 the HP or the Mac?
    Does Media Composer use multiple cores?

    James

    James 🙂

  • Jeff Greenberg

    November 23, 2011 at 4:19 am

    MC 6 uses multiple cores (so did 5!). It’s the processor type. That’s how you comparer. You’re mentioning the speed, but not the specific processor. Nephalem? Core2duo? i5, i7? Each iteration is a different release of processor from Intel.

    Best,

    Jeff G

    Certified Master Trainer | Adobe, Apple, Avid
    ————
    You should follow me (filmgeek) on twitter. I promise to be nice.
    New! FCPX DSLR workflows; What’s new in Media Comopser 6; Full Media Composer 6 basics from macProVideo.com
    Come see me speak at the Government Video Expo Nov 30 – Dec 1; Seminar link here
    My book (with Richard Harrington and Robbie Carman)- An Editor’s Guide to Adobe Premiere Pro
    Lynda.com – Compressor Essentials 3.5 and 4
    Contact me through my Website

  • James Marshall

    November 26, 2011 at 3:53 pm

    Ok so I am being simple here for my own benefit.

    My choices of platform are:
    (CHEAPEST) an HPz400 with Xeon® Quad-Core Processor W3550 (3.06 GHz)
    (MID) an iMac 3.4ghz i7 4 cores
    (EXPENSIVE)a Mac Pro with Two 2.4GHz Quad-Core Xeon “Westmere” (8 cores)

    Swings and roundabouts
    Macs have thunderbolt PCs have USB3
    Aja and Blackmagic I/o boxes fit both

    Do I take the cheaper PC option? is there a workflow or speed disadvantage in the PC over the mac.

    All thoughts gratefully received.

    cheers James

    James 🙂

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy