Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Audio Mixer or small diaphragm condenser?

  • Mixer or small diaphragm condenser?

    Posted by Jeff Dragomanovich on January 31, 2011 at 11:25 pm

    I’m trying to decide what is more important for receiving better interior dialogue. I’m looking at buying either a small diaphragm condenser microphone or a field mixer. I’m using a Zoom H4n field recorder with a Sennheiser 416 shotgun for both interior and exterior scenes. I love the 416 for exterior shoots, but not so much for indoors. I feel the condenser is probably the way to go, as it will solve many issues that the shotgun has when I’m recording indoors, but would like to get a few opinions first.

    Also any suggestions on what condenser microphone would pair well sonically with the 416? The Schoeps MK41 is a bit out of my price range at this point otherwise I wouldn’t be asking this question. I’ve been leaning towards the MKH 50 but have read it doesn’t necessarily match well with the 416.

    John Weeks replied 15 years, 5 months ago 3 Members · 2 Replies
  • 2 Replies
  • Eric Toline

    February 1, 2011 at 3:33 am

    Hard to say which mic will match your 416 to your satisfaction although both the Schoeps 641 & the Sennheiser MKH 50 have been used with 416’s. As you know the 416 has a very unique voice so perhaps you can find a used Sennheiser 405 as a mate since they both come from the same era.

    Eric

  • John Weeks

    February 19, 2011 at 3:06 pm

    A voice over buddy of mine is using a Rode NTG-3 while his 416 is in the shop. It doesn’t match perfectly, but comes close with a little eq.

    John Weeks
    http://www.johnweeksaudio.com

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy