-
mirrored RAID or 2 separate HDs?
I am in the field with 2 separate external HDs – to which I am dumping my footage on a daily basis. On the advice of my EX1 instructional video – I set them up as a “mirrored RAID” so that I could dump to just “one drive” and the data copied to both.
It appears I neglected to turn one of the drives on when I dumped the footage yesterday (which I would never know – because just 1 drive name mounts in the Finder) resulting in a data inconsistency between the 2 “RAID slices” – thus leading to my RAID appearing as “Degraded” in the disk utility. I then went to “rebuild a mirrored RAID set” in the Disk Utility – thinking it would quickly copy the missing 10 GB of data – but instead I’m getting “Estimated time left in Rebuild” of 2 days!!
There is only 10GB data total on the “good” drive – so even if rebuilding from scratch – there is only 10GB total to mirror? why on earth 2 days?
I am reconsidering my workflow – thinking I should start fresh with 2 separately formatted drives – this way – if I make any such future mistakes – or for some reason the 2 drives data becomes inconsistent – I can simply copy the missing data – vs. having all my eggs in the one basket of the joint/mirrored RAID?
Why mirrored RAID vs. 2 separately names drives? are the file transfer times any quicker vs. copying to both drives separately? I am worried about one month down the road – a similar issue occurring – but at a time when I have 2TB+ data on both drives and some small inconsistency between the 2 messes everything up, requiring 2+ days of “rebuilding” to fix???
This is my first time trying this workflow but so far see it as highly risky vs. formatting 2 separate drives and “mirroring” them manually?
I appreciate any advice as to what is my best strategy moving forward, many thanks!