Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Adobe After Effects Millions of Colors versus Trillions

  • Millions of Colors versus Trillions

    Posted by Sascha Engel on July 4, 2011 at 10:31 am

    I just converted some files inside AE to ProRes 1920*1080 (files we Avid based DNxHD), material from Phantom super SloMo. now I set my render output to ProRes HQ, but realised that the color settings were on Millions of Colors, not Trillions. Will the difference be very evident when importing to COLOR? The final output is for SD PAL Television though.

    Thanx for advice,

    Sascha

    Walter Soyka replied 14 years, 10 months ago 3 Members · 6 Replies
  • 6 Replies
  • Tudor “ted” jelescu

    July 4, 2011 at 2:05 pm

    Yes it matters.
    Here’s an article that explains why better than I could:
    https://www.photoshopessentials.com/essentials/16-bit/page-2.php

    Tudor “Ted” Jelescu
    Senior VFX Artist

  • Sascha Engel

    July 4, 2011 at 2:18 pm

    Thanx! I will check it out!

    Sascha

  • Sascha Engel

    July 4, 2011 at 5:49 pm

    Now, here’s a Nut to crack:
    Again the specs first original footage DNxHD Avid Codec 1920*1080, 25p, PAL converted in AE CS4 to ProRes HQ.
    I made two versions, one – ProRes HG Trillions of color in a 16bit project, then Millions of Color, same ProRes in a 8bit Project and here the result:

    I could not see on tiny bit of difference, even not when scaled up to 400-600%, but most strange thing was: The 8bit Millions of Color File was large, then its 16bit brother.

    How come.
    Me not understand.

    Greetz,

    Sascha

  • Sascha Engel

    July 4, 2011 at 5:50 pm

    Now, here’s a Nut to crack:
    Again the specs first original footage DNxHD Avid Codec 1920*1080, 25p, PAL converted in AE CS4 to ProRes HQ.
    I made two versions, one – ProRes HG Trillions of color in a 16bit project, then Millions of Color, same ProRes in a 8bit Project and here the result:

    I could not see on tiny bit of difference, even not when scaled up to 400-600%, but most strange thing was: The 8bit Millions of Color File was large, then its 16bit brother.

    How come.
    Me not understand.

    Greetz,

    Sascha

  • Sascha Engel

    July 4, 2011 at 10:27 pm

    But even leaving the quality issue aside for a second. How’s it possible, that the trillions of Color version in 16bit environment is smaller file size than the 8bit version?

    Sascha

  • Walter Soyka

    July 5, 2011 at 2:04 pm

    [Sascha Engel] “How’s it possible, that the trillions of Color version in 16bit environment is smaller file size than the 8bit version?”

    ProRes uses tightly-constrained VBR compression. It’s possible that with the ProRes encoder, the chromatically smoother trillions-of-colors version compresses more easily than the rougher, dithered millions-of-colors version.

    Also, I think ProRes 422 is always 10-bit, so shallower depths like 8-bit are expanded and won’t automatically require less storage space than deeper color depths.

    I’d also note that even if your eye can’t easily detect the difference, that doesn’t mean it isn’t there — especially for keying or qualified secondaries in color correction.

    Walter Soyka
    Principal & Designer at Keen Live
    Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
    RenderBreak Blog – What I’m thinking when my workstation’s thinking
    Creative Cow Forum Host: Live & Stage Events

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy