-
Mercalli 4.0 Rolling Shutter Compensation
I shot the following footage of an osprey nest last summer (1080 60P) with a Panasonic FZ200 handheld at a 600mm focal length (full zoom). First, the original footage. Second, stabilization with Mercalli 2.0 with the rolling shutter compensation box ticked. Third, stabilization using Mercalli 4.0 with CMOS correction. And fourth, stabilization using the Rock Steady camera model. The CMOS correction seemed to work surprisingly well, although it’s really slow. While the Rock Steady model works, it requires quite a bit of zoom. I would suggest using 4.0 only for such “problem” clips.
wwaag
-
1 Reply
-
[Wayne Waag] “The CMOS correction seemed to work surprisingly well, although it’s really slow.”
Yes. Here’s Prodad’s Support videos :-
https://www.prodad.de/support/mercalli/WhatIsJello.mp4
This is cool:-
https://www.prodad.de/support/mercalli/WhatIsVibration.mp4
Grazie
Video Content Creator and Potter
PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up