Following: *rant*
Well, this IS a workflow we use here very often and you don’t want see me swearing around on this “feature” FCP 6 brought in here – no, you don’t… I’m talking multicam (8-14) opera- and concert-programs 150 mins+ in HD.
– the recutting workaround:
For that recutting-workaround: I pull off the assistant’s bill from the next payble FCP-upgrade, may I?
– ever tried to call tech support?
Man, I’m not here to explain them how the software works, am I? I suppose answering questions on the phone is not the way to go into depth with a piece of code, is it? “Have you tried…” is not what I am aiming for here, believe me, I “tried” a lot of things!
I want: “I shouldn’t say that to you but… yes, we know about this issue, all our staff is into it – a promising update-seed are currently circulating, if you like we can take you in the recipients-group…”
Guys, even beta-testing is something I’d prefer over this ridiculous situation!
btw my workaround: oldschool-EDL out the sequence to online and re-import into a new project for recapture…
While this works well for hard edits it’s not for this sophisticated stuff a vanishing minority use (and bought) FCPFCS for – because FC is currently not working in a professional manner!!!!
Ah: don’t even think about using that XML-feature – it’s as reliable as the Media Mangler itself.
*/rant*
“it devoured my paper… – bummer!”
Jo