Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Adobe After Effects Measuring and correcting for lens distortion

  • Measuring and correcting for lens distortion

    Posted by Tamanegi65 on August 15, 2006 at 3:28 pm

    I’ve been dealing with quite a few HD shoots, either on green screen or just on location, where we track the camera and composite in CG objects.

    One thing I haven’t been doing that I know I should to get better results is measure and correct for lens distortion. But I’m not really sure how to do this. I’ve been looking online for some camera grids that we can shoot on set – but once I have that – how do I take that image and correct the footage?

    My guess would be to superimpose the footage of the grid with a direct image of the grid and modify/warp the footage til they match up. Is there a better way? Once I’ve done that should I run all my footage through that process to end up with ‘corrected’ raw footage that I can then use for camera tracking and compositing?

    Many thanks for any help.

    Matthew Lundstrom replied 19 years, 9 months ago 4 Members · 10 Replies
  • 10 Replies
  • Chris Smith

    August 15, 2006 at 4:50 pm

    Any 3D tracking softwre does this already. Since you need to get a track anyways, I’d use the software, it’s internal pipeline is everything you need, to undistort the image and get a proper track.

    Check out
    SynthEyes
    Boujou
    Matchmover
    PF Track

    Chris Smith
    https://www.sugarfilmproduction.com

  • Mylenium

    August 15, 2006 at 5:13 pm

    I concur with Chris. Those softwares have far more sophisticated algorithms than anything you could achieve within AE by e.g. using the Lens Compensation effect.

    Mylenium

    [Pour Myl

  • Tamanegi65

    August 15, 2006 at 6:55 pm

    Ah, ok – makes sense. Thank you.

    So, is there any use to shoot a calibration card with a grid on it during the shoot?

    And also – if I re-write out my footage after being corrected in the tracking software and render my CG stuff with the camera it creates – do I really need to reverse correct the CG elements to composite on the original plates? Couldn’t I just use the corrected footage? Wouldn’t it look a bit cleaner without the distortion? Or does the correction of the distortion create more artifacts due to smooshing pixels around?

  • Mylenium

    August 15, 2006 at 7:15 pm

    That mostly depends on what 3D software you have access to and what type of shots you have. If you use standard cameras in most 3D programs you don’t get correct distortions on your CG elements anyway (as they are simple pinhole cameras as in AE), only things such as Mental Ray’s lens shaders will do that. Also on wide shots you will barely notice any difference between distorted and undistorted footage except at the outermost edges, so there is usually little point in trying to match the lens curvature perfectly. I would only do that on tight/ close-up shots where distortions are very noticable.

    Mylenium

    [Pour Myl

  • Chris Smith

    August 15, 2006 at 7:37 pm

    Don’t need a card. Assuming you have any straight line along the X, Z, or/and Y axis, you create a couple user lines over where the hard edges are and it will figure out the correction.

    Chris Smith
    https://www.sugarfilmproduction.com

  • Tamanegi65

    August 15, 2006 at 7:56 pm

    I was just thinking some more about this – what about a green screen shoot? Yea, I put in tracking markers, but I don’t usually make sure they are in a line. I usually measure their location and take some picts on set for reference later – but typically there won’t be anything in frame that has a straight line….????

  • Chris Smith

    August 15, 2006 at 8:19 pm

    I gotta tell you that I’ve done a good handful of 3D tracks in my time and have never fixed the lens distortion as part of the process. My tracks are still dead on. But that being said I make sure to use great quality lenses. Unless yours is insanely distorted, you may not notice a difference.

    Chris Smith
    https://www.sugarfilmproduction.com

  • Tamanegi65

    August 15, 2006 at 8:39 pm

    I really haven’t noticed it too bad either – but there was one outdoor shot where we composited a building into a field and the shot began with a long dolly/pan to reveal the building. I was tracking the ground and other FG objects, as well as large tracking markers we put where the building was to go about 80-150 feet away, as well as far distant (300-1000feet) buildings in the background. I had a real hard time getting a clean track and I’ve been wondering ever since if it was due to lens distortion. It was shot with a VariCam – just stock lens I guess (not a prime, etc.)

    So in general do you just track and not really worry about lens correction unless it seems to be causing problems?

  • Chris Smith

    August 15, 2006 at 8:54 pm

    [DHenion] “So in general do you just track and not really worry about lens correction unless it seems to be causing problems?”

    That’s what I’ve done. Haven’t had to compenaste for distortion yet.

    Chris Smith
    https://www.sugarfilmproduction.com

  • Matthew Lundstrom

    August 16, 2006 at 1:47 am

    Apple Shake, and PF Hoe (an entry level version of PF Track) both do lens distortion correction out of the box. You do need a straight line reference however. If you shoot a gray card / color card on set that would work perfectly. It’s a good habit to get into anyways.

    MattLundstrom
    https://www.mattlundstrom.net

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy