Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums VEGAS Pro Maybe I never learned how to count

  • Maybe I never learned how to count

    Posted by Norman Willis on August 4, 2010 at 7:23 pm

    When I open a blank project in DVDA and add a 3.87GB MPEG-2 to the Project Overview Window, DVDA tells me the project size is now 4.1GB. Is DVDA reading file sizes differently?

    My issue, though, is that when I add a 0.158GB AC-3 audio file to the Project Overview Window, the project size now leaps to 11.2GB. (Funny, I thought 3.87 + 0.158 + 0.0006 = 4.028,6.)

    When I delete everything but the AC3 audio, the project size reads a whopping 7.1GB. An uninstall/reinstall does not change anything.

    You think maybe I never learned how to count? Or what am I doing wrong?

    Norman Willis
    http://www.nazareneisrael.org

    John Rofrano replied 16 years, 1 month ago 2 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • John Rofrano

    August 4, 2010 at 9:12 pm

    When I open a blank project in DVDA and add a 3.87GB MPEG-2 to the Project Overview Window, DVDA tells me the project size is now 4.1GB. Is DVDA reading file sizes differently?

    No, it’s adding overhead for the menus and other DVD file structures that are not the main movie.

    My issue, though, is that when I add a 0.158GB AC-3 audio file to the Project Overview Window, the project size now leaps to 11.2GB. (Funny, I thought 3.87 + 0.158 + 0.0006 = 4.028,6.)

    This sounds like you found a bug but it’s usually a harmless bug. If you tell it to render anyway it should fit on a single DVD.

    ~jr

    http://www.johnrofrano.com
    http://www.vasst.com

  • Norman Willis

    August 4, 2010 at 11:38 pm

    >>No, it’s adding overhead for the menus and other DVD file structures that are not the main movie.

    So I use the 4.1GB number, rather than 3.87GB?

    Norman Willis
    http://www.nazareneisrael.org

  • John Rofrano

    August 5, 2010 at 2:46 am

    So I use the 4.1GB number, rather than 3.87GB?

    Yea, the 4.1 is probably more accurate of what’s being used.

    ~jr

    http://www.johnrofrano.com
    http://www.vasst.com

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy