Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Adobe After Effects Massive quality loss on import – Due Friday

  • Massive quality loss on import – Due Friday

    Posted by Ed Sully on July 24, 2008 at 5:04 am

    Ive been working on this project 12 hours a day every day for the last month and tomorrow is the deadline. I currently am working with Apple PRO RES HQ footage, 29.97 non-drop bottom field first interlaced, editing on FCP and FX on AE.

    The problem:
    When i render out of AE, the footage looks good, but when i reimport it back into FCP the quality is destroyed, and i get strange error messages about how the footage doesnt match the sequence settings, yet ive have meticulously checked over AE’s render settings and the sequence settings as well as FCP’s project settings and they all match that of the original footage. At no one point was the footage ever exported under any other setting.

    I also tried importing the Post-AE footage into premiere and it has the same loss of quality, but without the error messages. Changing the sequence settings to what FCP reccommends for the footage only serves to destroy the quality further. I tried to export the footage out of FCP hoping that the poor quality was maybe just a problem with FCP’s preview, but it was the same.

    I dont know what to do, ive tried everything, making sure AE settings are set to bottom field first interlaced, exporting instead of rendering, i even tried disabling fields, theres really no other options left unless theres. There has to be some reason why two separate editing platforms are destroying quality-AE-exported footage upon import. Somebody help!

    Ron Lindeboom replied 17 years, 10 months ago 7 Members · 9 Replies
  • 9 Replies
  • Chris Wright

    July 24, 2008 at 6:24 am

    THE CHALLENGE: Getting DVCProHD video exported from Final Cut Pro 6, into After Effects CS3, and then back into Final Cut Pro without shifting color or gamma.

    THE PROBLEM: Apple and Adobe interpret Gamma differently when using the DVCProHD codec. Each use their own version of a DVCProHD codec.

    POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS:
    1) Use a 3rd party codec for both apps (Mainconcept, Canopus, Cineform, Raylight)
    Downside: Cost money and I’d rather not deal with them

    2) Use the Animation codec
    Downside: Animation is a buggy codec, dropping frames and such. Also, file sizes are ridiculously huge and impractical.

    3) Export Prorez HQ from FCP and in AE make an adjustment layer and tweak the gamma to 1.24.
    Downside: This is a crude, temporary fix and probably not perfect in the gamma matching either.

    and the long post:
    https://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/919924#940047

  • Scott Roberts

    July 24, 2008 at 7:11 am

    I would try a different codec . . . QT Photo JPG, QT Animation, QT PNG. What format are you to deliver?

    Color Grading presets for After Effects, Premiere, etc., plus free presets and more.

    LITTLE BLACK BIRD – PROFESSIONAL VISUAL EFFECTS

    https://www.littleblackbird.com

  • Todd Morgan

    July 24, 2008 at 1:33 pm

    Why not export to Avid’s DNxHD codec from FCP. Works like a charm, and then render to tiff sequence from AE back to FCP?

  • Ron Lindeboom

    July 24, 2008 at 4:33 pm

    [Chris Wright] “Animation is a buggy codec, dropping frames and such. Also, file sizes are ridiculously huge and impractical.”

    I have been using the Animation codec since 1994 when I bought CoSA After Effects 2.0 and I have never had any issues with using it. Never, in many hundreds and hundreds of times of using it.

    With the cost of drives what they are today, the file sizes are of little consequence. They were long ago but today they are such a minor inconvenience as to be of no issue to nearly all of the pros that I know. Why the size seems so important to you, I simply do not understand.

    If you don’t like something, that is your prerogative and your right. But espousing it as gospel is misleading…

    Best regards,

    Ron Lindeboom

    Remember: Burt Bacharach lied. What the world really needs now is an undo button.

  • Darby Edelen

    July 24, 2008 at 4:52 pm

    I agree with everything that Dave said. Also, in my experience working with footage from AE->FCP I would think that the first thing you should check are interlacing settings.

    Darby Edelen
    Lead Designer
    Left Coast Digital
    Santa Cruz, CA

  • David Bogie

    July 24, 2008 at 6:34 pm

    [Ron Lindeboom] “[Chris Wright] “Animation is a buggy codec, dropping frames and such. Also, file sizes are ridiculously huge and impractical.” “

    Chris, of course the Animation files are huge, it’s a lossless codec.
    You are probably trying to play it back in real time. Never could do that with Animation-based clips unless the version is hardware supported as on Ye Olde Media 100, which wans’t really Animation but a realtime proprietary codec that supported alpha. Man, I loved that thing.

    bogiesan

    This is my standard sigfile so do not take it personally: “For crying out loud, read the freakin’ manual.”

  • Chris Wright

    July 24, 2008 at 9:12 pm

    it has nothing to do with playback, its importing the animation clip back into AE. Many, many people in other forums talk about this, but since you guys are adament, I’ll relent and not bring it up again. 🙂

  • Ron Lindeboom

    July 24, 2008 at 9:18 pm

    [david bogie] “Never could do that with Animation-based clips unless the version is hardware supported as on Ye Olde Media 100, which wans’t really Animation but a realtime proprietary codec that supported alpha. Man, I loved that thing.”

    Or the ye olde SLOMO engine from the old NUBUS-based Media 100 — no one has still to this day created a slow-mo engine that is as easy to use, as quality in output and that makes a slomo that is as convincing to the eye of the audience.

    Best regards,

    Ron Lindeboom

    Remember: Burt Bacharach lied. What the world really needs now is an undo button.

  • Ron Lindeboom

    July 24, 2008 at 9:27 pm

    [Chris Wright] “Many, many people in other forums talk about this, but since you guys are adamant, I’ll relent and not bring it up again.”

    If I were to take this comment at face value, I would be left with the impression that the people in this forum are just stupid. Either that, or that the people in this forum know something that the others don’t know.

    Yes, we have a lot of newer users here but we also have a LOT of working pros who have been at this for many years. If this were a common problem as you espouse, I am sure it would come up here on a regular basis. It doesn’t. Well, except for one or two people whose experience seems quite contrary to the massive body of evidence experienced by the “body aggragate.”

    As David Bogie points out, it may be a localized issue that some people have just not worked through.

    Best regards,

    Ron Lindeboom

    Remember: Burt Bacharach lied. What the world really needs now is an undo button.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy