Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › Massive Amounts of XD Cam files
-
Massive Amounts of XD Cam files
Posted by Tom Daigon on August 18, 2008 at 12:04 amThe facility I work at just switched over to FCP. We have 2 bays with 8 tb for each.
A series of 13 1 hour shows will be editied simultaneously (segments). Theres a good chance it will be shot on XD Cam and mastered as DVCProHD. We are about to be buried in media and I am wondering if there is any way the XD Cam can be injested as a low res proxy then conformed back to the Hi res clips on the blu laser disk. I checked out MXR4MAC and FLIPFORMAC and neither seem to offer this workflow. Yes, I know storage is cheap, but I find it hard to believe that this new technology with all the info that is embedded in the clips is unable to function in the “low res/high res” work flow that tape did so well.
In some situations it would be nice to have the option.Steve Cohen replied 16 years, 7 months ago 13 Members · 30 Replies -
30 Replies
-
David Roth weiss
August 18, 2008 at 1:03 amTom,
XDCAM HD at 35mbps is only 15.31Gb per hour and at 25mbps it’s only 11Gb per hour. That’s great looking HD but at DV file sizes, and you can fit about 100 hours per terrabyte. That’s nothing.
I don’t know why you would even consider trading in your time for hard drive space at that kind of miniscule data rate?
David Roth Weiss
Director/Editor
David Weiss Productions, Inc.
Los AngelesPOST-PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE USUAL INSANITY ™
A forum host of Creative COW’s Apple Final Cut Pro, Business & Marketing, and Indie Film & Documentary forums.
-
Tom Daigon
August 18, 2008 at 1:10 amI think the data rate they will be shooting at is 50mbps, but your point is well taken. I just want to know what contingencies I have if other large projects materialize. After buying both bays the owner will definatley not spring for more storage so its good to know what options I do and dont have with
the files. -
Walter Biscardi
August 18, 2008 at 3:16 amOne big issue we just found with XDCAM is that the camera simply repeats file names at the start of each disc. Hopefully your camera operators will be better about setting up the file structure, but we got 14 discs that all started with clip C0001 so even if we did want to work in some sort of off line / online workflow, it wouldn’t work with those discs since we have 14 C0001 clips.
That’s one place where I find that P2 works very nicely in that even with the raw file names, it never repeats on the same camera.
As for your archiving / backup, there’s a new replacement for DLT tape that’s much faster. We’re going to be starting a new series with either the EX-1 or EX-3 and before we even start the edit, all material will be backed up to this format.
By the way, the XDCAM discs were shot at DV50 (SD) and we put all 14 discs on our system (8TB) and it’s just 185GB total.
Walter Biscardi, Jr.
Biscardi Creative Media
HD and SD Production for Broadcast and Independent Productions.STOP STARING AND START GRADING WITH APPLE COLOR Apple Color Training DVD available now!
Read my Blog!

-
Don Greening
August 18, 2008 at 5:07 am[walter biscardi] “We’re going to be starting a new series with either the EX-1 or EX-3 and before we even start the edit, all material will be backed up to this format. “
Walter, just so you’re aware. the EX1/3 cameras all have their own unique serial number as part of each clip name, so determining which clips go together should be a lot easier to keep track of in post.
– Don
-
Shane Ross
August 18, 2008 at 5:13 amYeah, this is one issue with the tapeless formats. No way to import as low res. Gotta bring it in full resolution. We have an odd struggle with this too. Complicated by the fact that we are mixing with HDCAM and MULTICLIPPING the files.
Don’t ask.
Shane
GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def -
Rafael Amador
August 18, 2008 at 5:14 amHi Tom,
I guess that may be a possibility to capture the clips at 18Mbps and then recapture at 50Mbps.
But, as David says, about starage is the same that if you would be working with DV50.[walter biscardi] “One big issue we just found with XDCAM is that the camera simply repeats file names at the start of each disc. Hopefully your camera operators will be better about setting up the file structure, but we got 14 discs that all started with clip C0001 so even if we did want to work in some sort of off line / online workflow, it wouldn’t work with those discs since we have 14 C0001 clips. “
With the EX-1 this don’t happens.
You start with number like that: XYZ_0000 so you have to shoot 9.999 clips to go again to XYZ_0000.
Then you can change the values of the three first figures. You can shoot 9.999.999 clips without repeating clip number.
rafael -
Tom Daigon
August 18, 2008 at 2:13 pmThanks alot everybody. I guess I’ve stumbled into the Achilles heal of video file technology. I am rather surprised and dismayed that such an effective method (low ress/ high res) cant be implimented when needed with the XDCAM format , although it sounds like P2 is doable.
-
Bob Flood
August 18, 2008 at 2:26 pmhey Walter
you said:
“As for your archiving / backup, there’s a new replacement for DLT tape that’s much faster.”
a new tape format? oooh oooh!!! tell us more! please?
“I like video because its so fast!”
Bob Flood
Greer & Associates, Inc. -
Andy Mees
August 18, 2008 at 2:46 pmits not that it can’t be done effectively Tom, its just that FCP doesn’t offer free and easy access to such a workflow. this is a choice by Apple, who promote instead the full resolution online only workflow
that said, there are options (i posted a couple on your same question on another board)
if you’re not tied to FCP but are tied to the format and workflow then the online/offline workflow using XDCAM proxies to edit with final conform to full res at a later stage works an absolute treat with other NLE’s … GVG EDIUS and Sony Vegas both offer exemplary XDCAM proxy to full res workflows
-
Tom Daigon
August 18, 2008 at 3:17 pmThanks Andy. Unfortunately after purchaseing 2 FCP bays recently, we are tied to FCP. Sad that Apple has chosen a path that short changes
the options we sometimes need to use. Thanks for the info.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up
