Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy making a very small video

  • making a very small video

    Posted by Josie Mac on January 9, 2013 at 4:44 pm

    I am starting with a 1920×1080 Pro Res 422 LT file that was shot at a wide angle to leave room for cropping. I need to edit it, add graphics, and end up with a 300×250 file. What should my workflow be?

    If I drop the raw file into the timeline, change the timeline settings to be 300×250 (or 640×480, for that matter), then resize the image appropriately using the wireframe, my resulting file looks significantly degraded.

    Should I output a 1920×1080 file, then crop and resize in MPEG Streamclip or Compressor? If so, what are the exact steps to get the best results? I have attempted this several times with various options in each and the results are too cropped, but the video quality does look better than attempting the crop/resize in FCP. Thanks in advance.

    Nick Meyers replied 13 years, 4 months ago 4 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • Steve Eisen

    January 9, 2013 at 5:26 pm

    Do everything in 1080. When you are finished, export QT Movie current settings. Let Compressor do the downsizing for you. 640×360, 360×120

    Steve Eisen
    Eisen Video Productions
    Vice President
    Chicago Creative Pro Users Group

  • Joseph Owens

    January 9, 2013 at 6:47 pm

    [Louise Macaulay] “starting with a 1920×1080 Pro Res 422 LT file that was shot at a wide angle to leave room for cropping.”

    Overshooting… One issue will be that you will have to be careful about all your other element placement.
    Maybe a 300×250 matte would help… or whatever will assist in predicting where your ultimate crop will be.

    Dropping the 1080 material onto a smaller timeline should not affect the overall quality if you are expecting to do a pixel-for-pixel extraction. Had you noticed if the timeline render status changed color? Perhaps the degradation was simply due to a Final Cut lo-res proxy preview.

    jPo

    “I always pass on free advice — its never of any use to me” Oscar Wilde.

  • Nick Meyers

    January 13, 2013 at 6:45 am

    if you really know for sure that you will never need a ful-size version of the piece,
    then you can easily edit in a smaller sequence.

    i wouldn’t work at the ultimate small size as that is non-standard, and you wont get any RT effects.

    the smallest standard sequence settings are the Offline-RT ones, but i would probably work in SD as a mid-ground.

    nick

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy