Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Compression Techniques MainConcept VS. Adobe Media Encoder for “H.264” output

  • MainConcept VS. Adobe Media Encoder for “H.264” output

    Posted by Tom Laughlin on April 22, 2010 at 10:02 pm

    I’ve downloaded the trial and tried MainConcept’s Encoder today, it’s awesome quality!!, but there is a concern from some people here at work that if we went with Adobe Media Encoder, that it might output a better quality file and faster? Can anyone verify the quality differences? Also, I don’t have AME at the moment for CS4, my final output will be for an H.264 codec/”.F4V file” for Flash. Which give you better quality, more control, better motion, colors, and encodes faster? Anyone else besides Jan Ozer, who I know would know, but I’m anxious to hear from more than one person or read more than from just one article.

    Thanks,

    Tom Laughlin
    Producer/Editor
    Salt Lake City, UT
    FCS3/Sony EX-3/Mac Intel

    Tom Laughlin replied 16 years, 3 months ago 2 Members · 2 Replies
  • 2 Replies
  • Daniel Low

    April 22, 2010 at 11:04 pm

    Unless things have changed recently Adobe licences the H.264 codec SDK in AME from Mainconcept.

    __________________________________________________________________
    Sent from my iPad Nano.

  • Tom Laughlin

    April 23, 2010 at 8:37 pm

    So, would the encode results be exactly the same, it is like the same encoder engine, then? If all the settings were exactly the same and I was encoding an 8-bit, 10 second test clip using MainConcept on a PC vs. encoding with AME on a Mac?

    Tom Laughlin
    Producer/Editor
    Salt Lake City, UT
    FCS3/Sony EX-3/Mac Intel

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy