Activity › Forums › DaVinci Resolve › Mac OS-X 10.8.3
-
Mac OS-X 10.8.3
Posted by Clark Bierbaum on March 15, 2013 at 4:31 pmJust updated MacPro 5.1 to 10.8.3 and CUDA 5.0.45 and all seems to work with Resolve. Please take all precautions (backup, not in middle of project etc.) before updating and don’t hold me responsible if your results vary.
Clark Bierbaum
Color Grading / Post Consultant
GarnetColor.com
Charlotte, NCElliott Balsley replied 13 years, 1 month ago 10 Members · 35 Replies -
35 Replies
-
Paul Provost
March 15, 2013 at 5:31 pmCuda update available, mentioned on another forum
http://www.4Kfinish.com | owner-colorist | Hollywood, CA
http://www.facebook.com/4kFinish -
Jake Blackstone
March 15, 2013 at 7:28 pmIs there specific reason why you rushed to do the OS and CUDA update before the official blessing from BM?
-
Clark Bierbaum
March 15, 2013 at 9:17 pmJake,
Had the time and will be starting several long form projects in the near future, and with Time Machine, why not? Thought it might be useful information for some, nice to give back.
Clark Bierbaum
Color Grading / Post Consultant
GarnetColor.com
Charlotte, NC -
Jake Blackstone
March 15, 2013 at 11:40 pmThat’s what I thought:-)
Why do it, when all you have to do is to just wait a little for BM to bless the new OS and CUDA and all is good.
ESPECIALLY, if you’re going to do “several long form projects in the near future”. Have you done an exhaustive testing of Resolve under various operating conditions, with various codecs, with various deliverables, with various panels etc? Just leave the qualifying of the OS and other important bits to professionals.
You think you’re doing public good, but in reality, it is never a good idea to disregard manufacturers recommendations… -
Elliott Balsley
March 16, 2013 at 12:16 amI see a major reason to update to 10.8.3, and that is Radeon 7xxx support. Personally, I can hardly wait for BMD to approve this update, because I could put a single-slot 7750 in my Mac Pro as a GUI card, as it requires zero aux power connectors.
-
Jake Blackstone
March 16, 2013 at 12:47 amYes, you can take your chances or you could spend $40 on GT120 and use approved hardware instead. Is $40 worth the possibility of drama of crashing and burning? I guess, if you feel like living on the edge, don’t let me stop you…
-
Paul Provost
March 16, 2013 at 12:53 am+1on the 7750
Be trying that out
Even BMD guys are saying the 120 is very long in the toothhttp://www.4Kfinish.com | owner-colorist | Hollywood, CA
http://www.facebook.com/4kFinish -
Jake Blackstone
March 16, 2013 at 5:38 amWhat exactly is wrong with GT120? Had been using it for over two years with no issues whatsoever. Should I worry?
-
Juan Salvo
March 16, 2013 at 6:55 amYeah, it’s become the bottleneck in many installs. It’s ancient, and slow. And there is now a bug with fcp7 and gt120 which causes constant dropped frames in OS 10.8+.
Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
-
Elliott Balsley
March 16, 2013 at 7:11 amI’ve read of some tests where GT120 + a nice GPU is slower than just that same GPU alone (for Resolve performance).
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up