Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Mac dual core 2.3ghz or 2.7ghz DP for editing

  • Mac dual core 2.3ghz or 2.7ghz DP for editing

    Posted by Dave Giordano on January 9, 2008 at 9:13 pm

    I’m deciding between the Powermac dual core 2.3ghz and the 2.7ghz dual processor. I have read conflicting reports of which is faster with rendering in FCP. I would also be willing to change out the graphic cards to the ati x1900 for the dual core 2.3ghz or the x800 xt for the 2.7ghz. I was wondering if anybody has had experience using these two macs and could provide some advice. Should I be concerned that one has pci-e slots and and pci-x?

    Thanks,

    Gio

    Zane Barker replied 18 years, 8 months ago 3 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • Paul Escandon

    January 9, 2008 at 9:46 pm

    I don’t know about the reports you’re referencing about the speed differences – but in direct response to your questions about PCI-e and PCI-X – I would definitely go with the newer technology which is PCI-e. PCI-X is considerably slower and already fading fast. I would go with faster and newer.

    * * *
    Paul Escandon
    Producer | Director | Editor
    Apple Certified Trainer – Final Cut Pro
    Oremus Productions
    http://www.oremusproductions.com
    – –
    Adjunct Professor of Media
    John Paul the Great Catholic University

  • Zane Barker

    January 10, 2008 at 2:21 am

    Please do not take this the wrong way but there is no such machine as a [Dave Giordano] “Powermac dual core 2.3ghz” Power Macintosh machines never had dual cores (dual cores meaning that each processor unit actually has 2 processors in it) they only had one processor chip per processor unit. The G5’s had dual processors (two completely separate processors. Dual Core Processors are an Intel thing.

    Now to the question. The difference in render times is not going to be to different between a Dual 2.5 G5 and a Dual 2.7 G5. However you did not say how much ram each machine would have that also plays a BIG part in the equation.

    Personally I would not want to be investing money into a system that at the newest is over 3+ years old.

    Don’t let technology get in the way of your creativity!

  • Dave Giordano

    January 10, 2008 at 3:14 am

    Hi Zane,

    Right before the intel chips came out in Macs they made a dual core G5 with PCI-e slots 2.0ghz, 2.3ghz and the quad 2.5ghz. everymac.com has all the info. It was the PowerPC 970MP processor.

    Thanks for the reply, I have been thinking about a Mac Pro its just the money factor as I am going to be stepping up and buying an hd camera as well. I am beginning to think that it would be better to stick with pci-e slots since that will be the norm now…sigh….I guess I should go crunch the numbers again.

    Cheers,

    Gio

  • Zane Barker

    January 10, 2008 at 4:12 am

    Sounds like you are referring to the G5 Quad, and if I remember correctly it had 4 completely separate chops no dual chips. But I could be wrong.

    But if you plan on putting anything in the expansion slots defiantly go for the newer model.

    What is the computer listed at, because it may be worth it to pay a little more to just get a new MacPro, or even a used MacPro since they were just updated the other day.

    Don’t let technology get in the way of your creativity!

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy