Activity › Forums › Broadcasting › Live internet show
-
Live internet show
Posted by Chad Green on June 28, 2009 at 4:37 pmHi,
I was approached to start a live weekly half hour internet show, it is a QVC style shopping show with 2 host selling about 6 items per show.
I need a detailed equipment list to make this show a possibility.
The show will feature:
– onscreen graphics and info about each product.
– live feedback to hosts ears as to what is selling well etc.
– cut to pre-excising product shots.
– live questions over the phone.
– fielding live email or twitter questions.Equipment I have:
– 2 HD cameras
– 2 lavalier mics
– 2 MacPros
– Full lighting kitThings I know I need:
– ability to tap hosts into phone line
– ability for director to talk to host and camera ops seperately
– mixer for 2 cams, audio and 2 pre-recorded feeds (possibly graphics on mixer lever)
– a great option on computer side is BoinxTV which I will do some testing on
– output feed from computer to encoding box???
– encoder to streaming serverIf there is anything I am missing please fill me in as well as giving me ideas on specific equipment models that you have success with.
Your help will be much appreciated,
Chad
gr********@***il.comAllen Wilbanks replied 16 years, 4 months ago 10 Members · 18 Replies -
18 Replies
-
Bob Zelin
June 30, 2009 at 9:35 pmHi –
this is what you need.1) money to build this studio
2) an engineer to put this together for you.This is not a “throw a firewire cable into my MAC, and make a live TV show.
Lets just take one of your issues – communications between your director, the cameramen, your talent, and the phone lines –
you need a professional communications system – like an RTS or Clear Com system. The minimum configuration is going to be a 2 channel system. 2 channels for the base station, one channel for the com boxes that go to the cameramen and director. The second channel will be used for IFB (interrupted foldback). You take your telephone interface box (from JK Audio – gee which one ?) – and you send the phone signal into the PROGRAM AUDIO INPUT of your Clear Com or RTS base station. This gets assigned to channel 2, which feed IFB beltpacks, which go to the ears of the talent. This way, the director can use the base station to talk to the talent, or switch the phone feed to the talent, so they can answer questions from the callers. All of this will cost more than your MAC, drives and a capture card.
But wait – there’s more – if you want to feed the audio from the talent back to the phone lines, so the callers can hear the answer to the questions, in addition to their internet audio, you need a full duplex hybrid from JK Audio (or others) so you can take an aux send from your mixer, and feed it back into the JK Audio phone interface, so the callers can hear what the talent has to say on their telephone ?
Confused ? Surprised it’s this complicated?
You are not getting answers to how to build a complete television facility on a simple thread on an internet forum. You need a contractor. And you need money to build this.An HD switcher that can handle multiple cameras, tape roll ins, key graphics, and have a live graphics generator (only 20 items left – order now before they are gone !) – will cost you A LOT OF MONEY.
And take a lot of configuration and wiring.Everyone gets so spoiled from how cheap it is to build an editing system, or graphics system today. But building a live production facility that is FULLY FUNCTIONAL is a lot more involved than someone saying “hey, get a tricaster – that’s all you need to have a fully functional TV studio”. This is just bulls#$%.
bob Zelin
-
Mark Suszko
June 30, 2009 at 10:14 pmWhat Bob said. Also, the Boinx product, while nice, is not in the right league for the level of project you are proposing.
You can go back and start over with a clean sheet of paper and start researching all the little bits and pieces yourself, but I would suggest your time and money is better spent getting a couple hours paid consultation from a pro engineer, if this is really a serious project. We can chip in ideas for you here and there, piecemeal, but you really need a contractor to do this for you, unless you’ve been in the biz as long as Bob and absorbed all this arcana required to create a meaningful bid off the top of the head.
Or maybe you might need to re-evaluate what you’re trying to do, why do you want or need to emulate broadcast QVC type stuff on the net. Computer auctions are a breed apart from TV ones, and to my mind, what might work better for you is to think of an auction site like ebay, but that has a live or looped playback video window on the side of the auction interface. If such a thing is even desired by people. It’s a subtle difference at first, but the more you look at it, the more you realize it is looking completely thru the other end of the telescope.
Frankly, for most things, I wouldn’t bother wanting the added drag and slowness of video on the page while I do my auction hunting. But that’s a business/marketing question, and not a tech one.
-
Bob Zelin
June 30, 2009 at 11:17 pmno Mark, you and Bob are both, old stupid people. I know I can build a complete TV studio for $5000, with full HD capability, full communications, full audio, and I can get the lighting, and web streaming for this as well. All you guys want to do is make fun of people that don’t know as much as you do – but we know more than you do. I know this can be done for $5000. I don’t know why people say it costs a lot of money to build a complete television facility, because my friend said that I can do it with a Newtek Tricaster, and some Radio Shack intercom systems. All you people do is try to insult us, when we KNOW that it can be done for a fraction of the price you people say we need to spend.
You are all so insulting. If someone knows how to do this for a low cost (under $5000) I would appreciate your help. I don’t need to be insulted by people that are not willing to help me. This is the 21st century – my friend in high school runs a TV show for his school, and we can do this, without spending a lot of money.
Damn you, Mark (and Bob).
Bob Zelin
-
Mark Suszko
July 1, 2009 at 2:55 amYeah, well, there is always that danger that we’re going to insult or chase off people asking for help. That’s not our intention. We’re not doing it to be mean. Well, OK, Bob does, but that’s just his way, and behind it is genuine concern for, if not your physical well-being, at least your financial well-being:-) I don’t know Bob personally, but one thing I think I know about you, sir, is that you have seen things done very wrong a lot of times, and you’d just as soon help people not repeat the same mistakes you’ve seen.
Chad, we could do like in the old Mickey Rooney/Judy Garland movies, find some old sheet music and costumes in the barn, etc. and everybody could chime in and recommend you one or two pieces until you had this big Mulligan Stew of a shopping list. And it *might* all fit together and work together. Maybe. But that approach is probably going to hurt you more than help you, because no two people are going to see your project and its needs the same way. Heck, I still don’t know exactly what Chad’s going for with this project in the first place, from a business/marketing standpoint. I really fear that when you combine the various suggestions, opinions, and strategies, you run a high risk of an expensive mash-up that will not perform as you want and need.
I can say I have been helping a guy with big internet video dreams put together a similar 3-camera production package; Toaster, 2 locked down cams and a manned or remote PTZ cam, lights, audio, a simple 3-unit intercom system, some cheap monitors. It can be a useful exercise, running thru the B&H catalog and adding stuff up, as it gets you familiar, once again, with what things cost. I was thinking I was insane, making up my list of a Toaster and all the other things that need to go along with that, and my “quote” for his shopping list for the bare minimum system I thought could do what he wanted was around $23k. And yep, the very first thing he asked me was why the Tricaster I spec’d was much more money than the one he saw. For one thing, his pick lacked the specific connectivity we needed due to his already buying cameras without guidance and me having to design around poorly chosen but non-returnable components we were already stuck with. It gets better, but that’s enough gossip. Also, I’m not charging that guy for my opinions or advice. It’s more along the lines of the free advice I would give a relative who wants to edit his home movies. I’m mostly warning him off of the worst directions to go, but not pushing him towards anything much. Though I’m really deeper into it than I should be going without charging. We’re still at the stage where he’s forming his long-term plan and seeking out the additional financing he’s now sure he needs.
I also showed him the quote for the same setup in high-def, but he was already in ventricular fibrillation from the standard-def quote. The reality check was useful though, as it brought him back to a place where I started with him, explaining how we could do smaller, modest, less ambitious baby steps and still get him towards his goal, but on a budget he could afford, and with quality that I might actually sign my name to.
This is the same kind of conversation you will have, Chad, when you hook up with a good VAR or consulting engineer. They have seen it all, they know what works and what can be bent to fit what you need and can afford. But you should not expect them to impart this hard-won wisdom for nothing at all in return. Tell them up front what your budget and resources are like, and what you’re trying to achieve, and one of them may take you on at a reduced fee just for the fun of it, or to “pay it forward” for the help they themselves once got from a mentor.
You might not get the answers you want, like from Bob. But also, like Bob’s answers, they will be the ones you need.
-
Chad Green
July 1, 2009 at 3:20 pmThank you Bob and Mark!
Your responses are invaluable to me.
Chad
-
Alan Lloyd
July 1, 2009 at 4:06 pmThey’re giving good advice.
I’ve done live internet and live TV and it takes some doing. And some hardware. And some people, and lots of money to do it well.
Something to consider: TV gives you what you want, how you want it, when they want to give it to you. The internet gives you what you want, when you want it, but you may not like how.
With time, the drift will inevitably be to the internet – bandwidth will not decrease, processing will not get worse, and the range of content will not get smaller.
It’s not quite there yet.
Best of luck to you, seriously. It’s going to be a lot of work. And then you – or someone – will have to promote the show itself.
-
Alan Smith
July 1, 2009 at 7:09 pmOr… you could just get a Tricaster Pro! Plug and Play is the way to go baby!!!
Oh Yeah!
Alan
Alan Smith
Media317Check out my blog – https://media317.com
-
Richard Cardonna
July 10, 2009 at 4:03 pmCheck Vidblaster at vidblaster.com this could handle your image needs
as far as graphics you can use photoshop with this app. You would need an audio mixerAs far as communications check eartec head wireless phones very reliable i use them on my productions, 5 headsets about 1k
Things are chaning a lot in the broadcast field. Just like when dv started all the die hard broadcast people said that it will never work.
Welcome to the 3rd milenium
R cardonna
-
Bob Zelin
July 12, 2009 at 7:22 pmRichard writes –
Things are chaning a lot in the broadcast field. Just like when dv started all the die hard broadcast people said that it will never work.
Welcome to the 3rd mileniumREPLY –
from this URL at Vidblaster –
https://vidblaster.com/?page_id=10
To connect your video camera, you can use any interface you like, e.g. firewire, USB or a video capture device like a USB or PCI frame grabber. See this forum post for more details.Richard defines the virus that exists in our industry today. Professionals strive for excellence, and people like Richard continue to push that USB and Firewire cameras are broadcast quality. THEY ARE NOT. They are toys – pieces of S#$% that are used by students. This is not a professional product that will handle SD-SDI and HD-SDI (or even composite or component SD) video signals.
As we continue to strive for excellence, and outdate analog video, and go to SD-SDI and HD-SDI, even these formats are not acceptable, and we continue to strive for 2K and 4K. If we do work in standard HD, we work to use professional excellent quality HD compression codecs like DVCProHD, ProRes422HQ, and AVID DNxHD 220 – NOT DV25 !
If you want to produce S#$%, then use product like VidBlaster. Even products like the Newtek Tricaster are professional products, and not a joke toy like Vidblaster. Be a professional – use professional equipment, with PROFESSIONAL QUALITY IMAGES. The iPhone is not a substitute for a RED camera.
bob Zelin
-
Mikeversteeg
July 13, 2009 at 8:32 amHey guys,
I am not going to join this discussion, if anyone has questions regarding VidBlaster then there’s a forum at the VidBlaster site just for that. But Bob, if you want to burn down my software at least make sure you get your facts right? VidBlaster does composite, component, HDMI and yes, SDI. In fact it supports any signal as long as an interface card for PCs exists for it. Maybe you should actually try it before posting your comments? While at it, do some research into the construction of a tricaster. It might surprise you 🙂
Cheers,
Mike
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up