-
Lightworks Mac Public Beta
-
[Lance Bachelder] “Resolve seems to suit me better as it’s has a traditional source/record workflow”
I bet Pr is happy that Resolve didn’t come out 3 years ago when X first came out and people started wondering what they would do.
They are in a better spot now. I think folks have had time to go to Pr and get settle in.
-
[Bill Davis] “nothing in this scenario requires more than X”
Will you be using a company logo? What format will that be in?
I am now stealing Walter S’s argument that .aep should be an open source format like .psd. (Note, I may have changed the terms by accident.)
-
[Bret Williams] “just an area below the timeline that moved along with it, where you could throw clips, graphics, or audio bits that you might use. “
I kind of smiled when I read this part because that’s how I find myself using X
I’m constantly dragging clips below the timeline and muting them in case I want to use them later (they don’t move along with it though).
I don’t want to go back and look for them, they are just sitting down there for me hehehe
I never really worked like that before, I think it would have been too cluttered.
-
[tony west] “I’m constantly dragging clips below the timeline and muting them in case I want to use them later (they don’t move along with it though).”
Good idea! Thanks!
-
[tony west] “I’m constantly dragging clips below the timeline and muting them in case I want to use them later … I never really worked like that before, I think it would have been too cluttered.”
I worked like that in FCP legacy all the time, in my case the video clips were up on tracks 3 and 4, the audio also on 3 and 4 – disabled.
Herb Sevush
Zebra Productions
—————————
nothin’ attached to nothin’
“Deciding the spine is the process of editing” F. Bieberkopf -
[Charlie Austin] “Hey, I’m not knocking it or saying it’s unsuitable for “professionals”, which is what was, and sometimes still is, said about X. I like how it looks, and it seems to work well. Though the hardware requirements are steeper than say, X, Pr or MC at this point. R11 is gonna be an awesome online/finishing tool, and I think that’s probably their plan. I doubt anyone will be cutting on-set on a laptop with it for a while.”
Didn’t mean to suggest that you were. My comment was tong-in-cheek. Remember, we always do things the same way… right up until it changes…
Mitch Ives
Insight Productions Corp.“Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.” – Winston Churchill
-
[Mitch Ives] “Didn’t mean to suggest that you were. My comment was tong-in-cheek. Remember, we always do things the same way… right up until it changes…”
Yep. 🙂
————————————————————-
~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~ -
True – I’m settled in and cutting on it right now – but still excited about Resolve – just looks better to me.
Lance Bachelder
Writer, Editor, Director
Downtown Long Beach, California
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1680680/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1 -
Well yeah we have multiple tracks now. Back then, and in Media 100 days as well, there just weren’t but maybe 2 tracks. No room for those disabled clips. But your disabled clips are still connected. Why don’t they basically stay put? That’s what I meant. As you moved the timeline back and forth they moved with it. Connected in a sense to the timeline above.
-
Gotta think that “free” is going to be a pretty big factor for people choosing “rent” Premiere or use what appears to be a stellar app in Redolve 11. I like Adobe products quite a bit. But since they’ll only rent them to be, it’s best if I break that addiction. It’s not healthy. 🙂
Light works obviously hasn’t made mass market inroads because it wasn’t available to a large part of the market. It wasn’t on the Mac. Both are pretty big announcements I think. Maybe they’ll take a little of Adobe’s share.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up