-
Lighting a slow-mo macro shoot with Red Epic – HMI or tungsten?
Hi,
I’m preparing a shoot and need some lighting advice.
I’m planning to shoot very small objects, mostly in liquid tanks using the Red EPIC at frame rates up to 300fps, and the Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro lens with as much depth of field as I can muster to get the most detail.
What I’m wondering is the best way to light the scene: cheaper tungsten lights, or HMIs?
Here are the factors involved:1. Both the high frame rate and wide depth of field demand a LOT of light
2. The area I need to light, however, will be very small – at largest, perhaps around the size of a golf ball – so I need lights that I can focus, if possible, to get maximum efficiency
3. I do not need especially need daylight temperature since what I’m shooting is quite abstract, so wouldn’t need to lose the normal stops CTB would inflict on tungsten.
4. If at all possible I would like to be able to operate on mains power rather than need a generator.I’ve consulted a lighting company who have suggested and quote me to use 2.5k HMI lights, which are £300 a week each including ballast, stands etc. I’m on a relatively tight budget, so I need to really understand whether I’m going to need the HMIs, or whether I could get away with using tungsten lights, which are obviously massively cheaper. I would really appreciate the experience of this forum.
So here are my questions:
1. Is there some way I can effectively calculate how much light I’m actually going to need prior to shooting, based on knowing the framerate, lens+f-stop and dimensions of the area I want to light?
2. Are HMIs the only way to go with shooting light this, or can I get away with tungsten?
3. Does anyone have any suggestions/experience lighting/shooting something similar, and can perhaps suggest an alternate way of doing it?All help massively appreciated. Thanks for taking the time to read this.
SK