Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Ken Burns – multiple times

  • Ken Burns – multiple times

    Posted by Rob Herfel on September 28, 2011 at 5:45 am

    I am editing some sports videos, and I use the Ken Burns to zoom and pan. I’d like to do this to multiple points in a clip – not just have a ‘start’ & ‘end’. I tried cutting the clip and using ken burns on the second part, but I can’t get the new start to match the first end. I’m guessing there is a better way- keyframes or another tool, but I can’t find it. Any suggestions appreciated!

    Dave Gage replied 14 years, 7 months ago 4 Members · 9 Replies
  • 9 Replies
  • Dave Gage

    September 28, 2011 at 5:07 pm

    Rob,

    Excellent! This has been my recent question also-
    https://forums.creativecow.net/thread/344/4357

    I hope someone decides to create a tutorial with some of the methods, ins and outs, and advantages/disadvantages of the different FCP X zooming approaches. This of course is all dependent on shooting at 1920 x 1080 and using using the footage on a 1280 x 720 timeline. This whole process is great in that it can give you pseudo 2-camera cuts and also the software version of pan and zoom. It’s perfect for guys like me who are a one man show with one camera.

    Thanks,
    Dave

  • Jeff Greenberg

    September 29, 2011 at 10:30 am

    Don’t cut the clip. Just keyframe it (the scale + position.)

    Best,

    Jeff G

    Apple Master Trainer | Avid Cert. Instructor DS/MC | Adobe Cert. Instructor
    ————
    You should follow me (filmgeek) on twitter. I promise to be nice.
    New- my book (with Richard Harrington and Robbie Carman)- An Editor’s Guide to Adobe Premiere Pro
    Compressor Essentials from Lynda.com
    (older but still good) Marquee, Media Composer (3.5) and Basic/Advanced Color DVDs (1.0) from Vasst.com
    Contact me through my Website

  • Rob Herfel

    September 29, 2011 at 9:10 pm

    Jeff

    Thanks – that is perfect. I had gotten so focused on trying it with the ken burns, that I didn’t look enough to figure it out! It’s great how fast you can move the scene to track someone.

    Rob

    ________
    MBP 2.53 i5 8GB 500GB

  • Rob Herfel

    September 29, 2011 at 9:11 pm

    Dave –

    It sounds like we are in similar positions –

    I love the fact that that much of the projects I’m doing are just for youtube – 720 at the most for my audience, so I can shoot 1080 and get so many different ‘views’.

    I had used two cameras for the last game I shot – one wide and one close in. I don’t move the wide view much, but it still gives some great clips to throw into the project. It really gives so much flexibility. I learned how to use the syncing to use the sound to get the clips two perfectly aligned – that is a time & hassle saver.

    Rob

    ________
    MBP 2.53 i5 8GB 500GB

  • Dave Gage

    September 30, 2011 at 7:47 pm

    Rob,

    Yep, couldn’t agree more. This whole 1080p to 720p project with Transform and keyframes is going to make my video life much more efficient and likely save me money buying a second camera. It is looking like the Transform/Keyframe method is going to make more sense then using the Ken Burns effect which is more limited to the a start and end point.

    Dave

  • Simon Ubsdell

    September 30, 2011 at 7:54 pm

    [Dave Gage] “It is looking like the Transform/Keyframe method is going to make more sense then using the Ken Burns effect which is more limited to the a start and end point.”

    Get ready to be really frustrated – all keyframes in FCPX are ease in/out only, there are no linear keyframes, no bezier control. It can get annoying very quickly, I’m afraid to say.

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Dave Gage

    October 1, 2011 at 3:27 am

    [Simon Ubsdell] “Get ready to be really frustrated – all keyframes in FCPX are ease in/out only, there are no linear keyframes, no bezier control. It can get annoying very quickly, I’m afraid to say.”

    I haven’t messed with it too much, but haven’t run into any issues. Can you clarify what you mean by “keyframes in FCPX are ease in/out only“?

    Thanks,
    Dave

  • Simon Ubsdell

    October 1, 2011 at 9:16 am

    [Dave Gage] “Can you clarify what you mean by “keyframes in FCPX are ease in/out only”?”

    Ease in/out keyframes make the movement slow down as it leaves/approaches the keyframe – this bothers a lot of people (see the recent “crop and feather” thread here) as they would prefer the option to have a continuous smooth movement between the keyframes (linear), or better still have user-adjustable control of the “easing” (typically bezier). in an ideal world we would have all three options (plus “constant” which is a step movement between keyframes).

    if it’s not bothering you then carry on, forget I spoke 😉

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Dave Gage

    October 1, 2011 at 7:16 pm

    Simon,

    Cool. I’m familiar with the concept for DAW fade in and fade outs, but I wasn’t familiar with the “easing” terminology. Makes perfect sense.

    [Simon Ubsdell] “(see the recent “crop and feather” thread here)”

    Yes, I’ve been following that thread also. I didn’t mess with keyframing much in FCP 7, so I’ve been trying to “school up” on animating with keyframes. I’ve read and watched everything I could the last couple of days. I didn’t have much use for it before, but I will from this point on. Thanks for the explanation.

    Dave

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy