Activity › Forums › Blackmagic Design › jpeg vs dv
-
jpeg vs dv
Posted by Margus Voll on September 26, 2006 at 6:16 pmHi.
This might be a bit off topic but can someone explain difference
between jpg and dv codeq.
I’m bit lost here.—
Margus
Luke Maslen replied 19 years, 7 months ago 3 Members · 5 Replies -
5 Replies
-
Luke Maslen
September 27, 2006 at 4:03 amHi Margus,
That’s a good question and I guess you are wondering which codec should you use if you’ve got the choice of a couple of different compressed codecs on Windows?
There are lots of ways to answer this question but the most common answer will be to use Motion JPEG as it is a superior codec in so many ways.
-
Wolf
September 27, 2006 at 1:43 pmHi
I captured the same clip with 8-bit uncompressed, dv and Motion jpg to compare the quality.
So, DV comparing to 8-bit uncompressed and M-jpg is really horrible.
Okay, it use only 6 time less space than uncompressed, but it stays horrible 🙂Then i compared M-jpg with uncompressed and i
-
Margus Voll
September 27, 2006 at 4:02 pm -
Luke Maslen
September 28, 2006 at 6:04 amHi Margus,
That’s great to hear 🙂
Regards,
Luke Maslen
Blackmagic Design -
Luke Maslen
September 28, 2006 at 6:09 amHi Claus-Peter,
Thanks for posting your observations and DV definitely has its uses but you’re right that uncompressed and Motion JPEG look much better. That’s pretty funny that you find Motion JPEG looks better than the uncompressed video. I can just see the advertizing now, “New Motion JPEG codec is better than Uncompressed …..” 😉
I see you’ve posted details of the bright strip further down in the forum so I’ll check that out soon. Thanks for all your information!
Regards,
Luke Maslen
Blackmagic Design
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up