Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › Is using NTFS a bad or really bad idea
-
Is using NTFS a bad or really bad idea
Posted by Ben Edwards on March 17, 2011 at 4:23 pmHi,
I have several external drives formatted NTFS with lots of media on them. I know it is not ideal but should/will it work. I am planing storing everything on one and backing up to the other.
I have NTFS-3G installed.
Ben
—
Ben Edwards – Freelance Filmmaker
https://www.funkytwig.comBen Edwards replied 15 years ago 8 Members · 13 Replies -
13 Replies
-
Andrew Rendell
March 17, 2011 at 4:28 pmIt’ll work but it’ll slow down your system, so it’s certainly a bad idea. Whether it’s a REALLY bad idea is down to whether you’re the kind of person who’ll smash his own brains out against the wall when you get frustrated…
🙂 -
Alan Lacey
March 17, 2011 at 5:25 pmBen, I’ve been using the freebie version of 3G-NTFS for sometime now. It works but is very slow. I’ve wondered whether buying the full version would speed up file tranfers. What’s your opinion?
Thanks Alan
FlashXDR,XDcamHD,XDcamEX,D9 etc
FCS,AE,Combustion,LiquidSilver,Vegas,Edius,
G5,MBP,Vista64,XP -
Michael Gissing
March 18, 2011 at 12:09 amThere is nothing inherently slow in NTFS. Both Apple and Microsoft are just bastards for making their OS’s so clumsy with the others formating. Having used MacDrive on Windows and also having Ubuntu Linux on the office machine, I can read and write to all sorts of formats and NTFS is perfectly acceptable for video editing. There is more difference in connection type than formatting.
If an NTFS drive is running slow on the Mac, then there must be a level of inefficiency in either Mac OS or the 3G-NTFS software.
-
Walter Soyka
March 18, 2011 at 1:29 am[Michael Gissing] “If an NTFS drive is running slow on the Mac, then there must be a level of inefficiency in either Mac OS or the 3G-NTFS software.”
3G-NTFS is slower than its commercial cousin, Tuxera.
Tuxera does have a 15-day demo version. Ben, you might want to try it and see how it performs. It would certainly be interesting to see the difference in speeds as reported by the AJA or BMD disk speed tools under 3G-NTFS and Tuxera.
Walter Soyka
Principal & Designer at Keen Live
Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
RenderBreak Blog – What I’m thinking when my workstation’s thinking
Creative Cow Forum Host: Live & Stage Events -
Alan Lacey
March 18, 2011 at 9:47 amYes that’s exactly what I was asking Walter. Being a PC man I know there’s nothing wrong with NTFS
Alan
FlashXDR,XDcamHD,XDcamEX,D9 etc
FCS,AE,Combustion,LiquidSilver,Vegas,Edius,
G5,MBP,Vista64,XP -
Ben Edwards
March 18, 2011 at 10:31 am“For backup/writing/reading: No problem.
For editing: No go.”Can you please expand on this. Is is a speed issue or is there something else.
One thing I have come across is if you let the Mac go to sleep when it wakes up it has problems with NTFS volumes but that can easily be sorted by not allowing Mac to sleep.
Ben
—
Ben Edwards – Freelance Filmmaker
https://www.funkytwig.com -
Ben Scott
March 18, 2011 at 1:45 pmuse XFAT
works on osx snow leopard and windows 7
supports over 4gb file limit of fat32 and we found copy speeds similar to hfs+
-
Ben Edwards
March 18, 2011 at 4:13 pmDo you mean xFat or exFat. Gogeling for xFat does not return mutch (apart from lots of exFat links).
—
Ben Edwards – Freelance Filmmaker
https://www.funkytwig.com -
Walter Soyka
March 18, 2011 at 4:26 pmIf you’re going to reformat anyway, why not reformat as HFS+ (so that you can expect everything in FCP to work) and install MacDrive from MediaFour on your PCs?
Walter Soyka
Principal & Designer at Keen Live
Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
RenderBreak Blog – What I’m thinking when my workstation’s thinking
Creative Cow Forum Host: Live & Stage Events
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up