Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Broadcasting Is Betacam sp 3:1:1 or 4:2:2?

  • Is Betacam sp 3:1:1 or 4:2:2?

    Posted by Brian on August 12, 2005 at 2:14 am

    I’d always assumed betacam sp was always in the 311 color space. (we use a sony d50) yet our DP said in theory it’s 311 but through some kind of hocus pocus technical stuff i didn’t understand the sampling is actually 422. clarification?

    Glenn Chan replied 19 years, 6 months ago 6 Members · 19 Replies
  • 19 Replies
  • R. Hewitt

    August 12, 2005 at 2:02 pm

    If memory serves me correctly, and as it’s an analogue format, it can’t really be described as either. However the luminance is layed in one stripe whereas the colour components are time compressed into a single stripe giving the effect of compression but it is only in the time domain and is stretched back on playback.

    But as in almost all tape formats the colour information is sampled (analogue) at half the rate of the luminance ie, 13.5MHz for the luminance and ~6MHz for each of the colour components.

  • Charley King

    August 12, 2005 at 4:41 pm

    [R. Hewitt] “If memory serves me correctly, and as it’s an analogue format, it can’t really be described as either.”

    Exactly!

    Charlie

  • Brian

    August 13, 2005 at 4:56 am

    If I’m not mistaken though, people like adam wilt refer to betacam sp as the “equivalent” of 3:1:1.

  • Charley King

    August 15, 2005 at 4:29 pm

    Guess I don’t know any people like Adam.

    Charlie

  • Brian

    August 16, 2005 at 2:45 am

    here’s adam wilt’s take:

    Chroma resolution on BetaSP is essentially the same as on 4:1:1 DV, so were BetaSP a digital format, its sampling might be characterized as 3:1:1 for comparison purposes. Of course, BetaSP is not sampled on a fixed spatial grid, so such numerical comparisions should always be taken with a grain of salt.

  • Charley King

    August 16, 2005 at 5:31 pm

    I had a long answer typed out and decided this statement doesn’t even warrant a reply.

    Charlie

  • Brian

    August 17, 2005 at 2:22 am

    no time for providing info to others but plenty of time for nasty sarcasm. I like your priorities.

  • Charley King

    August 17, 2005 at 3:16 pm

    I had already given the information, I’m sorry if you miunderstood my remark. In 44 years in the business I have never heard of 3:1:1. I have never heard of analog being discussed in digital sampling terms. So, my comment was concerning the fact that I have no idea where he gets his philosophies, because I have never met anyone who discusses any of these matters in those terms.

    Sorry that you took my comment as nasty sarcasm.

    Charlie

  • Brian

    August 18, 2005 at 2:33 am

    I don’t know where adam wilt gets his “philosophies” either but they don’t hand out degrees from Princeton to every Tom Dick and Harry. So I’m much less inclined to dismiss his ideas.

  • Charley King

    August 18, 2005 at 3:09 pm

    I feel it is best that I not give my “philosophies” of many who have degrees, without experience in the real world.
    So I feel it best to drop this discussion with the information I have already given.

    Charlie

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy