Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Creative Community Conversations Is Apple turning its back on photographers?

  • Is Apple turning its back on photographers?

    Posted by Kevin Patrick on December 9, 2011 at 3:19 pm

    It’s an old article, so you may have already seen it. I just stumbled across it the other day.

    It’s interesting to see the person come to the conclusion that they basically don’t trust Apple to keep Aperture around.

    “As much as I love Apple, I simply don’t trust them not to turn their back on me, the professional photographer, and turn instead to the other 200 people who live in my block of flats. After all, why should they bother selling me one copy, when they can sell them two hundred?”

    https://www.pixiq.com/article/aperture-or-lightroom

    Oh, and just to make this post gets enough FCP X coverage to justify it being in this forum …

    I really don’t care for the Magnetic Timeline. Except for when it’s really useful. What are your thoughts?

    Walter Soyka replied 14 years, 5 months ago 13 Members · 21 Replies
  • 21 Replies
  • Christian Schumacher

    December 9, 2011 at 3:42 pm

    Good article. I think the point the guy is making is that Apple may continue to further consolidate their products. So, perhaps Aperture will merge with Iphoto. Accordingly, Logic may merge with Garageband and FCPX would merge with iMovie. All for the sake of their success with smart devices and also their Appstore business model.

  • James Mortner

    December 9, 2011 at 3:46 pm

    Enjoyed the end line !

  • Tom Wolsky

    December 9, 2011 at 4:26 pm

    It benefits Apple to have two tiers of products. iPhoto/Aperture. iMovie/FCP. GarageBand/Logic, especially when the first tier are primarily free apps. The higher end apps are revenue streams. FCP has been number two on top grossing apps for a long time, second only to Lion, and Logic is now third.

    All the best,

    Tom

    Class on Demand DVDs “Complete Training for FCP7,” “Basic Training for FCS” and “Final Cut Express Made Easy”
    Coming in 2011 “Complete Training for FCPX” from Class on Demand
    “Final Cut Pro X for iMovie and Final Cut Express Users” from Focal Press

  • Shawn Birmingham

    December 9, 2011 at 4:43 pm
  • David Roth weiss

    December 9, 2011 at 5:35 pm

    [Christian Schumacher] ” I think the point the guy is making is that Apple may continue to further consolidate their products. “

    Consolidate? Now there’s an understatement. 🙂

    Wouldn’t it have been great if Apple had only decided to consolidate FCS instead of killing it?

    David Roth Weiss
    Director/Editor/Colorist
    David Weiss Productions, Inc.
    Los Angeles
    https://www.drwfilms.com

    Don’t miss my new Creative Cow Podcast: Bringing “The Whale” to the Big Screen:
    https://library.creativecow.net/weiss_roth_david/Podcast-Series-2-MikeParfitandSuzanneChisholm/1

    POST-PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE USUAL INSANITY ™

    Creative COW contributing editor and a forum host of the Business & Marketing and Apple Final Cut Pro forums.

  • Daniel Frome

    December 9, 2011 at 5:55 pm

    WIth photos, I think Adobe always had a much more popular and better offering (lightroom). If they dumbed down Aperture I don’t think it will cause nearly the stink that FCPX did.

  • Shane Ross

    December 9, 2011 at 6:51 pm

    [Tom Wolsky] “It benefits Apple to have two tiers of products. iPhoto/Aperture. iMovie/FCP. GarageBand/Logic”

    Except that they already killed the FCP tier. FCX isn’t on the same level. But in that case, they had iMovie/FCE/FCP. So they now just have iMovie/FCX (which is the new FCE). They killed their pro video editing app.

    Shane
    Little Frog Post
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Christian Schumacher

    December 9, 2011 at 6:59 pm

    [Tom Wolsky] “It benefits Apple to have two tiers of products. iPhoto/Aperture. iMovie/FCP. GarageBand/Logic, especially when the first tier are primarily free apps.”

    I can see your line of reasoning, but if their hardware is already successful, why give software away for free?
    And maybe some basic functionality could be introduced to the “Mic App” and “Camera App” that would replace the need for those free “first tiers”? Addicionally, wouldn’t be smart to merge not only the products, but also their development and support? I think this is the way they’re going. IMHO.

  • Christian Schumacher

    December 9, 2011 at 7:04 pm

    [David Roth Weiss]
    Consolidate? Now there’s an understatement. :)”

    I meant “consolidate” as “to join together as one whole”

    [David Roth Weiss]
    Wouldn’t it have been great if Apple had only decided to consolidate FCS instead of killing it?”

    If you meant it as “to make firm or secure” than yes, it would’ve been great.

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/consolidate

  • Walter Soyka

    December 9, 2011 at 7:22 pm

    [Daniel Frome] “WIth photos, I think Adobe always had a much more popular and better offering (lightroom).”

    Apple created the category. I think Apple and Adobe leapfrogged each other on feature set for the first couple versions — but notably, Aperture shipped first and introduced photographers to the notion of a RAW-editing photo management app.

    It certainly seems that Lightroom has all the momentum now, though. Anecdotally, I know a few photographers who switched from Aperture to Lightroom over time, but none who switched from Lightroom to Aperture.

    Walter Soyka
    Principal & Designer at Keen Live
    Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
    RenderBreak Blog – What I’m thinking when my workstation’s thinking
    Creative Cow Forum Host: Live & Stage Events

Page 1 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy