Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Panasonic Cameras Imagine Products ShotPut Pro and ProxyMill workflow

  • John Fishback

    October 14, 2009 at 8:37 pm

    Both excellent products. However, I thought the video missed mentioning what I consider the most important feature of ShotPut – clip verification. It slows down the off-load a couple of minutes, but you can be more confident that your off-loaded clips are good. I still play a few seconds of every off-loaded clip with HD Log (another Imagine product) before formatting the card for re-use.

    John

    MacPro 8-core 2.8GHz 8 GB RAM OS 10.5.5 QT7.5.5 Kona 3 Dual Cinema 23 ATI Radeon HD 3870, 24″ TV-Logic Monitor, ATTO ExpressSAS R380 RAID Adapter, PDE enclosure with 8-drive 6TB RAID 5
    FCS 2 (FCP 6.0.5, Comp 3.0.5, DVDSP 4.2.1, Color 1.0.3)

    Pro Tools HD w SYNC IO, Yamaha DM1000, Millennia Media HV-3C, Neumann U87, Schoeps Mk41 mics, Genelec Monitors, PrimaLT ISDN

  • Helmut Kobler

    October 15, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    Personally, I use Shotput Pro’s standard verification (“File Size Comparison (Fastest)”….The Imagine guys said that the more stringent “File Contents Verification” is really there for people who are paranoid. Their words, not mine! 😉

    I’ve had no problem with the faster verification method, and I found that using the slower method almost doubles the transfer times.

    Anyway, I would love to use ProxyMill for making proxies, but it doesn’t take advantage of multiple cores on a Mac Pro very well. I have a Nehalem 8 core MP, and Proxy Mill uses about 200% of my machine’s CPU load, whereas Compressor can use about 4 times as much. It’s just much faster. The Imagine guys told me that they’re going to take advantage of some of Snow Leopard’s features to speed that up…when that happens, I hope to become a ProxyMill user too.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy