Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Image Pixelating in Full Screen Mode

  • Image Pixelating in Full Screen Mode

    Posted by Aleks Gezentsvey on February 7, 2011 at 5:30 pm

    Hello,

    I’m new to CreativeCOW, but I have exhausted all my resources trying to figure out this issue, so any help would be really really appreciated!

    I am helping put together a pitch presentation for my current job and they decided to run the presentation from an FCP Project. It had to be an SD sequence, since the majority of stuff as an standard def (DV PAL 720X576). However, there are some stills that had to be included as well. The stills are huge (3144X1500 pixels, 300DPI), yet here is what happens: they display great at 100%, but look incredibly pixelated when in full screen mode. It is an SD sequence, so I guess that makes sense, because full screen is blowing up the images, is that right? Same thing happens to the titles. (They are rendered completely, the RT is unlimited and playback quality is dynamic – also tried full).

    I’m wondering if there is way around that? I tried exporting the stills (both out of an SD and an HD sequence) as a same as source QT and reimporting them, making freeze frame, exporting screen grabs… but no luck.

    Another option, which is a question #2, I guess, is – if they have a “client” monitor as opposed to going full screen during the presentation, would the problem persist? And if not, (question #3) can a projector be set up as an external monitor and recognized by FCP?

    I’m running FCP 7.0 on MAC OS X 10.6.4 / 2X2.66GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon / 12GB

    thank you so much.
    Aleks

    Rafael Amador replied 15 years, 6 months ago 4 Members · 10 Replies
  • 10 Replies
  • Michael Gissing

    February 7, 2011 at 11:29 pm

    The stills are not being blown up but drastically reduced in size. Pixelation on stills and titles however is a common problem using a DV sequence.

    Try copy pasting your final edit into a ProRes422 or 10 bit uncompressed timeline (SD 720 x 576) and then render. You may not see much in the original DV footage but all graphics, text & stills will be better. Also note that DV is the only lower field PAL codec. FCP will automatically apply the shift fields filter to the DV footage. If you have slo mos then bake those in by making a new quicktime of the slo mos before you copy into the uncompressed or ProRes timeline.

  • Aleks Gezentsvey

    February 8, 2011 at 1:29 pm

    Thank you so much for the tip!

    I did what you suggested and it’s a major improvement. I also tried setting the field dominance to “none” as opposed to “lower” in my regular DV PAL timeline and that seemed to help a bit as well. But the uncompressed ProRes sequence is the way to go!

  • Michael Gissing

    February 10, 2011 at 12:44 am

    Your ProRes sequence should be interlaced and upper.

  • Lauren Marsolier

    February 15, 2011 at 12:21 am

    Hello,

    I am also having problems with my still images loosing quality and I don’t have the latest FCP. I have version 5.1.4. What is the best format to use to get best quality stills in the movie? That would be great if someone could help me with that.

  • Aleks Gezentsvey

    February 15, 2011 at 4:31 am

    What are your project/timeline settings?

  • Lauren Marsolier

    February 15, 2011 at 5:28 pm

    Hello,
    My sequence settings are: fr.size 720×576, 25fps, DV-Pal, Pix aspect PAL-CCIR-601, field dominance lower.
    I have a photo-jpeg on one track and a film on top of it on a 2nd track. The film has the same settings as the sequence and the photo-jpg is fr.size 919×576, 25fps, pixel aspect square, field none.
    Thank you for your help!

  • Lauren Marsolier

    February 15, 2011 at 6:04 pm

    Also I forgot to mention that the quality loss happens when I export the movie to quicktime (with current settings) and strangely it also gets slightly squeezed…

  • Aleks Gezentsvey

    February 16, 2011 at 3:13 pm

    Making a Pro-res sequence as per Michael’s suggestion definitely helped me. Maybe you can try and export the images out of the pro-res sequence and import them into DV PAL as a clip.. see if that does anything.

    Another thing that helped me slightly was setting the field dominance to “none.” But no matter how you twist it, the images never looked as crisp as when I was working with them outside of the DV sequence.

  • Lauren Marsolier

    February 20, 2011 at 4:01 am

    OK. I’ll try that. Thank you!

  • Rafael Amador

    February 20, 2011 at 8:56 am

    [Lauren Marsolier] “OK. I’ll try that. Thank you!”
    Right, but Prores is not an option if you have FC 5.X.
    You can try DVCPro50, 8/10b Uncompress or even PhotoJPEG (75% quality is great).
    You may also try setting “Render in High Precision” and “Render Motion Effects: BEST”.
    rafael

    http://www.nagavideo.com

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy