Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › if you had to choose a format
-
if you had to choose a format
Posted by Ben Oliver on January 12, 2006 at 8:00 pmif you had to choose a video format for the web, what would you choose.
windows media
quicktime
or
realplayer?
i work at a university and this is the debate. which one will allow people at home, on any os platform to view videos easier?
my vote is for QT
Ed Dooley replied 20 years, 3 months ago 6 Members · 6 Replies -
6 Replies
-
Alexander Gao
January 12, 2006 at 8:02 pmI would personally choose H.264 Quicktime. That would be an efficient yet high quality format, easy to stream or download, and pretty much universally playable.
Alexander Gao
“When the revolution happens, I’ll be leading it.”
-
Ben Oliver
January 12, 2006 at 8:04 pmi usually compress sorenson three quicktime, a lot of people havent upgraded there quicktimes i find……the losers. lol
im not really worried about codecs, just more about format….codecs are a whole other headache!
-
David Roth weiss
January 12, 2006 at 8:48 pm[thewanggao] “H.264 Quicktime… pretty much universally playable.”
Not really!!!
-
Bob Auiler
January 12, 2006 at 9:23 pmH.264 is amazing, but I run into a problem with a couple of our larger clients who won’t allow anyone to update applications on their computers.
Windows Media 9 is a very good choice if you need compatability and good quality.
-
Matthew Brunn
January 12, 2006 at 10:04 pmI compress videos to be downloaded by businesses and personal use all the time and this is my experience. If you have a savvy customer Quicktime is great. H.264 is superior quality. If you are looking for UNIVERSAL playback it’s unfortunately Mpeg-1. I have yet to find a customer that can’t play it. Window Media is next. Then Quicktime.
For quality that depends again on your delivery and bandwidth. If these people are on dial up they ain’t waitin for some 36 MB file to download. For me it’s a snap. It’s a balance. How big a file (quality) vs. the delivery plus Format (QT,WMV,MPEG) = answer.
Hope this helps-
Matthew
Dual 500 G4
OSX 10.3.5
Ram 1.38
FCP 4.5/AE 6.5/DVDSP3 -
Ed Dooley
January 13, 2006 at 8:07 pmDitto, for the most part. We’re starting to include FLVs in the mix. And as soon as Flash 8 gets on more machines, we’ll be doing a lot more.
Ed[Matthew Brunn] “I compress videos to be downloaded by businesses and personal use all the time and this is my experience. If you have a savvy customer Quicktime is great. H.264 is superior quality. If you are looking for UNIVERSAL playback it’s unfortunately Mpeg-1. I have yet to find a customer that can’t play it. Window Media is next. Then Quicktime.
For quality that depends again on your delivery and bandwidth. If these people are on dial up they ain’t waitin for some 36 MB file to download. For me it’s a snap. It’s a balance. How big a file (quality) vs. the delivery plus Format (QT,WMV,MPEG) = answer.
“
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up