Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy if you had to choose a format

  • if you had to choose a format

    Posted by Ben Oliver on January 12, 2006 at 8:00 pm

    if you had to choose a video format for the web, what would you choose.

    windows media

    quicktime

    or

    realplayer?

    i work at a university and this is the debate. which one will allow people at home, on any os platform to view videos easier?

    my vote is for QT

    Ed Dooley replied 20 years, 3 months ago 6 Members · 6 Replies
  • 6 Replies
  • Alexander Gao

    January 12, 2006 at 8:02 pm

    I would personally choose H.264 Quicktime. That would be an efficient yet high quality format, easy to stream or download, and pretty much universally playable.

    Alexander Gao

    “When the revolution happens, I’ll be leading it.”

  • Ben Oliver

    January 12, 2006 at 8:04 pm

    i usually compress sorenson three quicktime, a lot of people havent upgraded there quicktimes i find……the losers. lol

    im not really worried about codecs, just more about format….codecs are a whole other headache!

  • David Roth weiss

    January 12, 2006 at 8:48 pm

    [thewanggao] “H.264 Quicktime… pretty much universally playable.”

    Not really!!!

  • Bob Auiler

    January 12, 2006 at 9:23 pm

    H.264 is amazing, but I run into a problem with a couple of our larger clients who won’t allow anyone to update applications on their computers.

    Windows Media 9 is a very good choice if you need compatability and good quality.

  • Matthew Brunn

    January 12, 2006 at 10:04 pm

    I compress videos to be downloaded by businesses and personal use all the time and this is my experience. If you have a savvy customer Quicktime is great. H.264 is superior quality. If you are looking for UNIVERSAL playback it’s unfortunately Mpeg-1. I have yet to find a customer that can’t play it. Window Media is next. Then Quicktime.

    For quality that depends again on your delivery and bandwidth. If these people are on dial up they ain’t waitin for some 36 MB file to download. For me it’s a snap. It’s a balance. How big a file (quality) vs. the delivery plus Format (QT,WMV,MPEG) = answer.

    Hope this helps-
    Matthew
    Dual 500 G4
    OSX 10.3.5
    Ram 1.38
    FCP 4.5/AE 6.5/DVDSP3

  • Ed Dooley

    January 13, 2006 at 8:07 pm

    Ditto, for the most part. We’re starting to include FLVs in the mix. And as soon as Flash 8 gets on more machines, we’ll be doing a lot more.
    Ed

    [Matthew Brunn] “I compress videos to be downloaded by businesses and personal use all the time and this is my experience. If you have a savvy customer Quicktime is great. H.264 is superior quality. If you are looking for UNIVERSAL playback it’s unfortunately Mpeg-1. I have yet to find a customer that can’t play it. Window Media is next. Then Quicktime.

    For quality that depends again on your delivery and bandwidth. If these people are on dial up they ain’t waitin for some 36 MB file to download. For me it’s a snap. It’s a balance. How big a file (quality) vs. the delivery plus Format (QT,WMV,MPEG) = answer.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy