-
HVX200 versus V1U
I edit on FCP and am considering buying a low end HD camera for an upcoming high end industrial project. Of course, I would hope to use it for some of my other clients including cable and regional PBS after this initial use. Since I already own a 100a, my thinking was to go with an HVX200.
However, when I called up the two discount houses I most often do business with, they both advised me to buy a V1U instead.
If I go strickly by cost and reduction of hassle, their advice seems to make sense. Getting P2 cards from the camera into your FCP and on a reliable long term storage system seems awkward and uninviting.
Features of both cameras seem similar in most cases with one notable difference, the capture rates. the HVX200 has the 720 settings option which the U1V does not. It seems cable channels lean toward that as acceptable (and only that setting).
Is that an important enough difference to make me sway towards the HVX200? Are there other considerations about the interface with FCP or the ability to come up with a product that I should consider? Are there opinions about which way to go – the HVX200 or the U1V?
Thanks. I need all the input I can get. I’m no wiz when it comes to technical matters.