Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › How do you make the time line scoll along with the play-cursor?
-
How do you make the time line scoll along with the play-cursor?
Christopher Wright replied 20 years, 11 months ago 10 Members · 23 Replies
-
Sean Lander
October 4, 2005 at 10:36 pmHere’s what I do guys. I’ve mapped “OPTION+” and “OPTION-” to my microsoft mouses’ scroll wheel.
This zooms in and out on the timeline. When a large timeline is playing I just zoom out a little and then zoom in
a little. Very handy when watching a very long piece. I mainly do docos and long tv shows so couldn’t live without this.
If you want to try this you will need to get Microsoft’s old driver as the new one doesn’t have the ability to map the scroll wheel. Email me if you’d like a copy.Cheers
Sean
-
David Roth weiss
October 5, 2005 at 1:02 am[Walter Biscardi] “Boris 3D is excellent for titling”
Walter,
Come now… You’re definitely in the minority about this one.
Have you ever used a program such as TitleMotion? I wouldn’t even call TitleMotion excellent, but its light years ahead of clunky Boris 3D.
DRW
-
Walter Biscardi
October 5, 2005 at 1:41 am[David Roth Weiss] ”
Walter,Come now… You’re definitely in the minority about this one.”
Been using it since they released it for corporate and broadcast work. What’s so bad about it? Vector based graphics that look pristine on output. What more do I need?
[David Roth Weiss] “Have you ever used a program such as TitleMotion? I wouldn’t even call TitleMotion excellent, but its light years ahead of clunky Boris 3D.”
No, but why would I? I have Boris 3D, LiveType, Motion and After Effects. If I can’t create a simple lower third using any of these tools, then I’m pretty hopeless.
Walter Biscardi, Jr.
Creative Genius, Biscardi Creative Media
https://www.biscardicreative.comNow in Production, “The Rough Cut,” https://www.theroughcutmovie.com
Now editing “Good Eats” in HD for the Food Network
“I reject your reality and substitute my own!” – Adam Savage, Mythbusters
G5 Dual 2.0, AJA Kona 2, Medea FCR2X
-
David Roth weiss
October 5, 2005 at 2:11 amOkay Walter, the fact that you haven’t ever used a titler like TitleMotion (PC only unfortunately) explains how you might call Boris 3D excellent.
TitleMotion is a heck of a lot better layed out, and makes it very, very simple to create multiple cards based upon a design you’ve already created. Its all vector-based, and a breeze to create all kinds of vector shapes, and a breeze to color and to create very sophisticated BG gradients. Trust me, you would like it…
DRW
-
Christopher Wright
October 5, 2005 at 3:34 amWalter,
Just to make things clear, I also use Boris RED, Continuum, After FX, Shake, Combustion, Lightwave, Particle Illusion, Motion, Live Type, Mirage etc. and still pine for an app like Inscriber’s Title Motion within FCP itself. As I said before, if you haven’t had the pleasure of working with it, you of course will be happy with what you’ve been given. In all the other apps you mentioned, you still have to go into another app to make decent titles with vector shapes as well as just text. Even though the integration between FCP, Motion and Live Type is a little better now, it still doesn’t touch Inscriber’s product. You could do all of your lower thirds work, bullet animation AND see your text over whichever background frame (wherever your timeline cursor is parked) that you wanted. I can always kick out killer title animation with any of the other methods you mention, but none are as elegant as Title Motion. And isn’t Apple and FCP studio all about elegance??
As far as the Pinnacle/Fast products, the autosave is automatic after every keystroke. That again is excellence! -
Rick Dolishny
October 5, 2005 at 12:49 pm> AND see your text over whichever background frame (wherever your timeline cursor is parked) that you wanted
That’s actually a really huge deal, and missed sorely.
– Rick
-
Steve Connor
October 5, 2005 at 8:07 pmThe background frame is the key thing here, I used Titlemotion for 3 years and I liked it a lot, but if I could have either that with background frame or Livetype with no background frame, I would choose Livetype every single time, I don’t find it a major pain to export a second or two of video into Livetype if I need it. Every single time I show a client what it can do, it always gets a smile!
I’m also with Walter on the Boris titler, for down and dirty text work it’s absolutely fine and the quality is great.
Steve Connor
Cardinal HD -
Christopher Wright
October 6, 2005 at 3:27 amYes, but unfortunately “down and dirty” is all you get, and without animatable vector shapes!! After working the smart and easy way, having to export anything to any other app just to do titling is counter-intuitive to say the least. And more time-consuming.
-
Steve Connor
October 6, 2005 at 7:21 amAs with a large majority of the discussions here on the COW, it all comes down to personal choice doesn’t it. Your “smart” way may vary from mine!
Steve Connor
Cardinal HD
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up