-
help needed selecting IO card and Broadcast Monitor
I am working on building my editing station. Coming from still photography I understand how important it is to have the correct setup to check color and cropping. I am trying to determine the correct video I/O card and the correct SD broadcast monitor for my setup.
At this point in time, the only thing that is in stone is the software: Adobe Production Suite
I am currently use PC’s, but for my software development business, if the budget allows I plan to make the new box a Mac Pro that I will dual boot. I am open to moving my Adobe Production Suite license over to a Mac license. It looks like most of the IO cards for the Mac don’t support Adobe, only Final Cut Pro, which seems to be a majorly limiting factor.
Also, I have spoken with the camera man for the shoot. He will be shooting Panasonic Varicam at 720p. He will loan me a tape deck with HD-SDI out to download the footage to the editing station. The final output this year is SD DVD and web. HD is going to be released next year. So my whole objective is going to import twice, once at 720p, the second will be down convert to SD.
From all practical purposes, the Blackmagic Design DeckLink HD Extreme looks like the ideal card. It seems to do everything I need, except the down convert, but from what I understand that can be done in software, a bit slower but if I am only doing it once, it isn’t an issue. One thing I do like about it is the HDMI input/output, I would like to get a low end HD camera and use a HDMI cable to capture strait into the editing station when shooting at home.
I don’t fully understand all the implications of shooting at the different FPS, which might very well be a factor in picking the right IO card. I don’t know all the different things the footage might be used for in the years to come, so I would like the raw footage to give me the maximum flexibility. I am assuming this means shooting at 60 FPS.
I know that 24P is the native speed of film cameras, so shooting at that speed gives you the big screen look and feel. I see a lot of cameras being able to shoot in 24P, is the whole idea that if you shoot in 29.97 fps and then pull down to 24P, you get a different look then if you shoot in 24P? What happens to the look and feel of the footage when you do a reverse pull down from native 24P to 29.97 fps for NTSC DVD? Does that maintain the 24P look? In the end, am I better off shooting in 24P and simply maintaining the film like look/feel rather than shoot at 60 fps? (I know a drawback to 60 fps compared to 24P is more than twice the data, but HDs are cheap IMHO)
With all the issues of frame rate, I am wondering if the AJA XENA LH is a better option because of the extra hardware conversion it can do? Having hardware based HD to SD downconversion in the AJA XENA LH, I am wondering if my life would be easier if I modified the workflow and forgo the import where I was downconverting to SD. Do all the editing, even for the SD DVD I need this year, on the HD footage, leveraging the hardware downconversion to get the footage out to the SD broadcast monitor.
I do really like all the features of the Matrox RT.X2 to speed up editing, but it looks like it does not have the HD SDI inputs I need to import from tape. When encoding the SD DVD, will the AJA XENA LH hardware downconversion be used, or is that ONLY used when going to one of the output ports on the card (like the SD SDI/Component/Composite video output?
And finally, I am looking to keep the cost down on the SD broadcast monitor. It looks like JVC has some 10” CRT’s for less than 1000 USD, and then there is also the Sony LMD1410/LMD1420. Are those viable options or am I better off purchasing a used unit from somewhere? If so, any recommendations on where to go and which monitors to look at? There is also the JVC DT-V1710CGU, which if I understand correctly is about 2000 USD with a basic SD card, but can be upgraded to a HD monitor with a more expensive card. Is this worth the extra investment, as an expandable way to get a HD broadcast monitor?
Sam