Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › HDV Workflow without an I/O card?
-
HDV Workflow without an I/O card?
Posted by Alec Gitelman on March 21, 2008 at 1:54 amHi,
I’ve started editing some video work in a theater that recently received some equipment. That includes a few HDV cameras (Canon XH A1s, i believe) and a new Mac Pro 8-core with FCS2. What it doesn’t have though is an AJA or Blackmagic card to transcode the footage on capture and there is no way they will get one in the near future.
So, I’m stuck with capturing HDV. Where do I go from there? Should I edit in an HDV timeline or an Apple Pro Res 422? Should I transcode the footage after capture? What’s the best way to work?
Alec.
Jeff Carpenter replied 18 years, 1 month ago 3 Members · 7 Replies -
7 Replies
-
David Roth weiss
March 21, 2008 at 2:03 amYou can capture HDV as ProRes on the fly via firewire. There’s a tutorial on the Cow by Chris Poisson, use the search function and you’ll find it. But, editing native HDV with an octo-core ain’t all bad.
David Roth Weiss
Director/Editor
David Weiss Productions, Inc.
Los AngelesPOST-PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE USUAL INSANITY ™
A forum host of Creative COW’s Business & Marketing, and Indie Film & Documentary forums.
-
Jeff Carpenter
March 21, 2008 at 2:04 amI capture to Apple Intermediate Codec over firewire. AIC is like HDV, but it fills in the GOP structure with all “i” frames. It takes up more drive space but is easy to edit once you’ve got it in there. And because the conversion isn’t too complicated it can do it live from firewire.
-
David Roth weiss
March 21, 2008 at 3:28 pm[Jeff Carpenter] “I capture to Apple Intermediate Codec over firewire.”
Jeff,
How come you capture to AIC and not ProRes?
David Roth Weiss
Director/Editor
David Weiss Productions, Inc.
Los AngelesPOST-PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE USUAL INSANITY ™
A forum host of Creative COW’s Business & Marketing, and Indie Film & Documentary forums.
-
Jeff Carpenter
March 21, 2008 at 5:46 pmWhy use Pro-Res and not AIC?
I’m not trying to be difficult, I’m just saying that it never really crossed my mind to worry too much about which one I was using since they seemed so similar.
Yes, Pro-Res HQ is better, but it takes up more space. From what I can tell, regular Pro-Res and AIC are pretty much the same in terms of space. And since all my output is SD DVD, I can’t tell any difference between the final product when using one or the other.
Heck, I can’t really tell the difference when it’s still HD, either. So what I’m saying is, they seem to be about the same for what I do, so the fact that I picked one over the other was more of a coin-flip kind of choice.
-
David Roth weiss
March 21, 2008 at 7:04 pm[Jeff Carpenter] “Why use Pro-Res and not AIC?”
I believe ProRes is, for sake of a better term, more lossless than AIC. Its the newer, better replacement for AIC. Doesn’t mean you have to use it though…
David Roth Weiss
Director/Editor
David Weiss Productions, Inc.
Los AngelesPOST-PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE USUAL INSANITY ™
A forum host of Creative COW’s Business & Marketing, and Indie Film & Documentary forums.
-
Alec Gitelman
March 21, 2008 at 7:23 pmOk, so I will capture HDV, besides being able to reference the media on tapes drive space is also an issue.
However, what happens when I start applying effects? My impression was that HDV crumbles when manipulated because of the i-frames. Am I wrong?
-
Jeff Carpenter
March 21, 2008 at 9:14 pm“More lossless” is a term that comes into play when lots of filters and alterations to the video are going on.
Ok, so there’s the answer to your original question: That’s not me for 90% of the work I do.
So, given what I do, I guess it just didn’t really matter which one I used. I was never able to find a difference in my own work, so I didn’t dwell on it too much at the time.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up