Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy HDV Workflow

  • Posted by Michael Esteves on June 16, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    Hi,

    Just wondering what the corrected workflow would be when working with HDV Footage.
    I never really used this as a medium.
    I just want to know some of people’s experiences and stories/advice when 1)capturing, 2)editing, 3)color correcting and 4)authoring.

    Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated1

    Cheers,

    mE

    Steve Oakley replied 16 years, 11 months ago 4 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • John Fishback

    June 16, 2009 at 10:44 pm

    There are many threads about this. So do a search to find more complete info. I’ve not edited with HDV, but my sense of it is most folks recommend capturing HDV as ProRes and editing in that format. HDV is a long-GOP format that’s a bear to work with. ProRes is a terrific editing format with high quality.

    John

    MacPro 8-core 2.8GHz 8 GB RAM OS 10.5.5 QT7.5.5 Kona 3 Dual Cinema 23 ATI Radeon HD 3870
    ATTO ExpressSAS R380 RAID Adapter, PDE Enclosure with 8-drive 6TB RAID 5
    24″ TV-Logic Monitor
    Final Cut Studio 2 (up to date)

    Pro Tools HD w SYNC IO, Yamaha DM1000, Millennia Media HV-3C, Neumann U87, Schoeps Mk41 mics, Genelec Monitors, PrimaLT ISDN

  • Ron Craig

    June 17, 2009 at 1:28 am

    I’ve done a bit of this. As John suggested, importing as ProRes is highly recommended. And, as he alsop suggested, there are a lot of threads on this.

    I’ve had some audio synch issues when ingesting HDV as ProRes so keep an eye on synch if you go that route.

    I think a better workflow — if you have the hardware — is to import from an HDV deck that sends a component signal to some kind of AJA card. In my case, I have an AJA box that converts the component signal to SDI and I then route that to my Kona 3.

    Bottom line: Get away from HDV as an editing format. Don’t get me wrong, FCP can edit HDV. It’s just not the optimal way to go — mainly because the long GOP format puts some heavy demands on your processor.

  • Steve Oakley

    June 17, 2009 at 4:44 am

    I keep hearing this “HDV is hard to edit”, “its processor intensive”, ect.

    would you please be specific. does HDV limit you to editing on 15 frame intervals ? no. does it some how not edit to the frame ? no. so tell me!

    my short answer is, not HDV is not a problem at all…really. yes it does want more CPU time then **some** other codecs, but not all.

    My G4 1.5ghz laptop captures and edits 720p24 and 720p30 HDV JUST FINE ! it’ll play without dropping frames, it’ll do dissolves, it’ll finally drop down once you put a 3 way color corrector on it. still very serviceable for basic editing.

    my long gone G5 2.5ghz ate thru HDV for years

    my 8 core 2.8 doesn’t even notice its HDV.

    FCP stinks is with HDV capture. its just not reliable when doing native captures. using something like a MXO2 with HDMI / component / HD SDI ins and outs can make capture a lot easier. it also helps with monitoring too.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy