Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy HDV to ProRes 422 via firewire. Any tips?

  • Shane Ross

    February 27, 2008 at 9:14 am
  • David Mcgiffert

    February 27, 2008 at 9:33 am

    Shane,

    That is a spot on tutorial recommendation.
    I have been using it for the last week or so
    and it is working really well with FCS2, Canon XH-A1,
    Mac Pro two 3.0Ghz Quad-Core Intel, OSX 10.4.11.

    However, as everyone probably knows, it uses lots more
    disk territory.

    David

  • Walter Biscardi

    February 27, 2008 at 10:29 am

    [David McGiffert] “However, as everyone probably knows, it uses lots more
    disk territory.”

    But still miniscule compared to going to Uncompressed HD.

    We still cut all our HDV material in DVCPro HD as we’ve found very little difference between that and ProRes 422 for HDV originated material.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Biscardi Creative Media
    HD and SD Production for Broadcast and Independent Productions.

    STOP STARING AND START GRADING WITH APPLE COLOR
    The new Color Training DVD now available from the Creative Cow!

    Read my Blog!

  • Hamilton Robinson

    February 27, 2008 at 12:07 pm

    Thanks guys.

    I really appreciate your advise.

    This website is awesome!

    Ham

  • Paolo Ciccone

    February 27, 2008 at 3:18 pm

    I wouldn’t do it as ProRes is a lossy codec and you are basically transcoding from HDV, lossy encoding at 4:2:0, to another lossy codec. This will give you a generation loss.
    If you get to *capture* in ProRes then no problem but transcoding will inevitably lead to image degradation.
    An alternative to Uncompressed is BitJazz’s SheerVideo (https://www.bitjazz.com) which is completely lossless while being less than 1/2 the size of Uncompressed.

  • Warren Eig

    February 27, 2008 at 4:07 pm

    I just did this with some footage shot with Canon’s XL-H1 with their 24F footage. Used the HDV 24p easy set up but changed the codec to ProRes 422 (HQ) and brought it in through firewire.

    The footage was transcoded on the fly and looks great. And shows up as 23.98 fps.

    Warren

    Warren Eig
    O 310-470-0905

    email: warren@babyboompictures.com
    website: https://www.babyboompictures.com

    https://www.atomfilms.com/af/content/knitwits
    https://www.atomfilms.com/film/family_xmas.jsp

  • Walter Biscardi

    February 27, 2008 at 4:29 pm

    [Paolo Ciccone] “I wouldn’t do it as ProRes is a lossy codec and you are basically transcoding from HDV, lossy encoding at 4:2:0, to another lossy codec. This will give you a generation loss.”

    In reality, the “generation loss” is completely negligible. When comparing the HDV original material to our finished and graded DVCPro HD masters, the DVCPro HD Masters generally look better than the originals. To my eye I can’t see any difference between HDV and the converted DVCPro HD files.

    Yes there is a loss in there if you zoom way in on the files and you compare stuff on a scope, but with your eye, watching on a 50″ professional plasma HDTV screen, you can’t tell the difference.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Biscardi Creative Media
    HD and SD Production for Broadcast and Independent Productions.

    STOP STARING AND START GRADING WITH APPLE COLOR
    The new Color Training DVD now available from the Creative Cow!

    Read my Blog!

  • Ted Griffis

    February 27, 2008 at 4:53 pm

    Walter,

    Are you transcoding your HDV to DVCProHD or are you capturing at DVCProHD?

    Ever work with the Canon HDV 24F format? How do you treat that in your workflow since there are no pro decks that play it.

    Thanks,
    Ted

    Ted Griffis
    GriffisART
    https://www.griffisart.com

  • Paolo Ciccone

    February 27, 2008 at 5:55 pm

    Hi Walter.

    I agree with you that immediately there is no visible loss, in fact that’s how Apple advertises ProRes, as “visually lossless”, but the data loss is there and if we add to it with other manipulations the final result will be visibly deteriorated. I’m just trying to add a little bit of caution in the way people treat their footage. With HDV, I work both with the JVC HD100 and the XDCAM, it’s pretty easy to make irreparable damage. I like the idea of using ProRes for either capture, via component out or HDSDI, or as an intermediate codec for editing but I’m kinda of a purist when it comes to pixels and I want to be sure that people understand that there is a generation loss with this kind of transcoding. Of course, as usual, it all depends on the material and the deadline :), if we are talking about interviews and ENG then no problem. It’s just that many time people tend to use a “shiny hammer” for all their projects and then I end up color correcting footage for a film festival and the clips have been shredded to the last bit of usable color and I’m expected to revive what’s no there anymore 😉

    In my opinion, if the footage is for a feature or narrative work, transcoding to *any* lossy codec, not just ProRes, should be avoided. When it comes the time to color correct and grade the difference will be visible.

    BTW, I enjoyed your articles a lot, thanks for sharing.

  • David Roth weiss

    February 27, 2008 at 5:56 pm

    Ted,

    Chris Poisson, who wrote the tutorial about HDV to Pro Res via Firewire uses one of the Canon cams too and he shoots 24p… So, try it out… I like that workflow and use it myself on all things HDV.

    David

    David Roth Weiss
    Director/Editor
    David Weiss Productions, Inc.
    Los Angeles

    POST-PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE USUAL INSANITY ™

    A forum host of Creative COW’s Business & Marketing, and Indie Film & Documentary forums.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy