Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › HDV to Beta SP workflow
-
HDV to Beta SP workflow
Posted by Brandon Carter on July 17, 2010 at 3:34 amI am editing HDV footage. My final product is then sent to compressor and down converted to ProRes SD, then laid on an sd time line and exported to Beta SP. I feel like I’m loosing some quality somewhere. I’m wondering what some of you guys would recommend as a work flow. Thanks.
Michael Gissing replied 15 years, 10 months ago 6 Members · 10 Replies -
10 Replies
-
Michael Gissing
July 17, 2010 at 3:41 amIf you have Kona card you can down convert as you playout from the HDV timeline to Sp Beta. Faster and better down convert than Compressor.
I used to have Decklink HDPro which didn’t do as good a downconvert as the Kona, but I don’t know if Decklink downconvert has improved with more recent cards & software.
-
Brandon Carter
July 17, 2010 at 3:54 amI have a blackmagic card and while it downconverts quickly, the quality is TERRIBLE. I’m wishing I would have opted for the Kona card now.
-
Michael Gissing
July 17, 2010 at 4:07 amYes my old Decklink was worse than Compressor. In order of quality my list would be
Best – Teranex or specialist hardware equivalent
Next – Kona3 or Sony HDCam deck (yep on some programs I prefer this to the Kona)
Cheap – Compressor
Desperate – FCP or Quicktime Comversion or Decklink -
Shane Ross
July 17, 2010 at 3:35 pmWhy you dissin’ Decklink? It does a FINE job of downconverting. Did you set up all the settings properly in the Decklink interface? I can’t tell you what they are, I haven’t used one in a while, but it was the first card I had and I used it MAINLY to downconvert HD to SD for output.
Shane
GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def -
Steve Eisen
July 17, 2010 at 3:55 pmDitto. It’s got to be user error. I still have my Decklink in my G5. MXO2 on my Mac Pro and Kona 3 offsite. All perform great downconversions.
Quality all depends on what your source footage is.
Steve Eisen
Eisen Video Productions
Vice President
Chicago Final Cut Pro Users Group -
Michael Gissing
July 17, 2010 at 11:51 pmI was being specific about my Decklink HD Pro card. It is still in my old G5. There is nothing to the setup page but to choose which SDI connector to downconvert with (it is a dual 444 card or 2 x 422 SDI) and a choice as to anamorphic or letterbox. I did say that newer cards and software may have improved the Decklink downconverts.
The downconverts were soft, on a par with FCP scaling so I used my HDCam deck which is just as good as the Kona3.
-
Brandon Carter
July 18, 2010 at 2:50 amWhen I downconvert and output through the Decklink card the video comes out very jittery and blocky looking. If it could be user error, I wish someone could point out some settings to check. Compressor is converting much better, but its very soft and not so sharp. I’m looking for the ABSOLUTE best quality here.
-
Pradip Patil
July 18, 2010 at 5:01 pmHi Brendon,
I have faced similar situation earlier with Blackmagic. The problem was with external video playback settings in FCP. I had set it to SD resolution and that was causing the problem.
I changed it to HD resolution and the quality of the downconverted video improved a lot. -
John Fishback
July 18, 2010 at 7:36 pmI’m not familiar with those cards, but have you fed proper reference video to all devices?
John
MacPro 8-core 2.8GHz 8 GB RAM OS 10.5.8 QT7.6.4 Kona 3 Dual Cinema 23 ATI Radeon HD 3870, 24″ TV-Logic Monitor, ATTO ExpressSAS R380 RAID Adapter, PDE enclosure with 8-drive 6TB RAID 5
FCS 3 (FCP 7.0.2, Motion 4.0.2, Comp 3.5.2, DVDSP 4.2.2, Color 1.5.2)Pro Tools HD w SYNC IO & 192 Digital I/O, Yamaha DM1000, Millennia Media HV-3C, Neumann U87, Schoeps Mk41 mics, Genelec Monitors, PrimaLT ISDN
-
Michael Gissing
July 20, 2010 at 2:50 amYes I have always had ref video fed to all machines and I/O cards. Decklink are great cards but one of the motivations for changing to Kona was their superior downconverts.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up
