Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy HDCAM to DVC PRO HD

  • HDCAM to DVC PRO HD

    Posted by Dan Atkinson on May 14, 2009 at 9:52 pm

    Someone has given me some HDCAM tapes, which is obviously 8 bit, and shot anamorphically at 1440 x 1080.

    Rather than bringing this in as Pro-Res is there anything stopping me capturing this to DVC-ProHD – it’s also 8-bit and anamorphic HD?

    It would sure save me some space and I could take the project home and work on it from a firewire drive.

    Cheers

    Dan

    Walter Biscardi replied 16 years, 11 months ago 6 Members · 11 Replies
  • 11 Replies
  • Shane Ross

    May 14, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    Nothing stopping you. That is what I’d do.

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Dan Atkinson

    May 14, 2009 at 10:36 pm

    Then that’s what I’ll do.

    Thanks, Shane.

    Dan

  • Kevin Monahan

    May 15, 2009 at 12:18 am
  • Shane Ross

    May 15, 2009 at 12:21 am

    [Kevin Monahan] “I’d go ProRes.”

    Yeah, you would.

    (lol)

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Walter Biscardi

    May 15, 2009 at 2:08 am

    All HD cameras are anamorphic. Anywhere from 960×720, 1280×1080 and 1440×1080 are the primary sizes shot by most all HD cameras.

    If you capture ProRes then you will be capturing full raster 720 or 1080 frame sizes. I would probably capture to ProRes myself if you have the AJA Kona boards.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Biscardi Creative Media
    HD and SD Production for Broadcast and Independent Productions.

    Read my Blog!

    STOP STARING AND START GRADING WITH APPLE COLOR Apple Color Training DVD available now!

  • Andrew Kimery

    May 15, 2009 at 8:30 am

    A slight correction to Walter’s post would be to say that most HD cameras do not record to full raster codecs. Some examples of cameras that use full faster codecs are 720p HDV cameras, the EX1 & EX3, and AVCIntra cameras.

    -A

    3.2GHz 8-core, FCP 6.0.4, 10.5.5
    Blackmagic Multibridge Eclipse (6.8.1)

  • Walter Biscardi

    May 15, 2009 at 10:27 am

    [Andrew Kimery] “Some examples of cameras that use full faster codecs are 720p HDV cameras, the EX1 & EX3, and AVCIntra cameras.”

    With the Sony’s it depends on how you record. At least from the specs I’m reading on the EX 1 and EX 3: The new camera sports (3) 1/2” CMOS sensors, each with 1920×1080 resolution (and the XDCAM HD codec records in full resolution). It can also record in 1440×1080 XDCAM format to SxS express card media.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Biscardi Creative Media
    HD and SD Production for Broadcast and Independent Productions.

    Read my Blog!

    STOP STARING AND START GRADING WITH APPLE COLOR Apple Color Training DVD available now!

  • Gary Adcock

    May 15, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    [Andrew Kimery] “A slight correction to Walter’s post would be to say that most HD cameras do not record to full raster codecs. Some examples of cameras that use full faster codecs are 720p HDV cameras, the EX1 & EX3, and AVCIntra cameras. “

    Yeah Andrew

    we are talking about TAPE here.
    HDCam is a TAPE format (8bit 3:1:1 recorded at 1440×1080) and walter was correct.

    There are any number of ways to shoot full raster without having to suffer thru the multitude of camera native compression schemes that can degrade your image quality much greater that a little anamorphic squeeze.

    gary adcock
    Studio37
    HD & Film Consultation
    Post and Production Workflows

    Check out
    https://www.aja.com/kiprotour/

    Inside look at the IoHD
    https://library.creativecow.net/articles/adcock_gary/AJAIOHD.php

  • Dan Atkinson

    May 15, 2009 at 5:22 pm

    Ok. I guess the best way is to do a little test and see what’s acceptable.

    If i capture to Pro-res at least my wife will be happy that I’m not bringing work home!

    Sorry Walter, we use Matrox here.

    😉

    Dan

  • Andrew Kimery

    May 15, 2009 at 5:53 pm

    Walter,
    Yes, the lowest quality setting on the EX cameras does not record 1080 at full raster.

    [gary adcock] “Yeah Andrew

    we are talking about TAPE here.
    HDCam is a TAPE format (8bit 3:1:1 recorded at 1440×1080) and walter was correct. “

    Even when talking about tape based cameras not all of them use non-square pixels. Walter is correct in that there are a number of different non-square pixel formats but stating that all HD camera formats use non-square pixels is not correct.

    -Andrew

    3.2GHz 8-core, FCP 6.0.4, 10.5.5
    Blackmagic Multibridge Eclipse (6.8.1)

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy