Activity › Forums › Adobe Premiere Pro › H.264 vs H.265
-
H.264 vs H.265
Posted by Harry Mao on December 29, 2015 at 7:29 pmIs there an image quality difference between H264 and H265?
With everything else stays the same, and exporting an 1080p clip
What’s the difference between themDuke Sweden replied 10 years, 7 months ago 5 Members · 6 Replies -
6 Replies
-
Shane Ross
December 29, 2015 at 8:28 pm[Harry Mao] “Is there an image quality difference between H264 and H265?”
Yes…tons. H.265 is tons better than H.264. Better compression.
[Harry Mao] “With everything else stays the same, and exporting an 1080p clip”
Yup. It’s newer, and has better compression, looks nicer.
[Harry Mao] “What’s the difference between them”
I’m an editor, not a video technician. But the compression algorithms are better. close to the same file sizes as H.264, meaning might hover right in the same range…but the image is sharper and cleaner. I can’t pull out a chalk board and point out all the technical reasons…I’m sure if you google you can figure that out…
Shane
Little Frog Post
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def -
Shane Ross
December 30, 2015 at 2:40 amAt this time, H.265 is not supported by either website, as far as I know. it’s very new.
Shane
Little Frog Post
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def -
Tero Ahlfors
December 30, 2015 at 7:46 amH265 is more advanced and can cut bitrate needs down by half compared to H264. This also means that it’ll take a bit longer to export in H265 compared to H264.
-
Joe Thio
December 30, 2015 at 3:04 pmIf you’re looking for maximum quality for YouTube, you can use VP9 which is of similar quality to H.265 and you can actually upload it. YouTube videos are converted to VP9 by default anyway. PP doesn’t support VP9 without a plugin though, there’s one called “WebM for Premiere” that will do the job.
-
Duke Sweden
December 30, 2015 at 6:16 pmWould using VP9 fix that problem I, and a lot of others, have with youtube adding a reddish cast to skin tones?
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up