-
H264 gives better results than ProRes 422(HQ) or Uncompressed?!
H264 gives better results than ProRes 422(HQ) or Uncompressed?!
I have a peculiar problem and was wondering if anyone could chime in. I have some footage that I need to send to a colorist and want to export it to 10-bit uncompressed. But the export always ends up with some weird, pixelated color-smearing in one particular scene when I export to either uncompressed or ProRes 422HQ. Curiously, the footage looks fine if I export via H.264. Why doesn’t uncompressed or PR give superior results?
Here are the particulars:
- Footage originated on Panny AF100 8-bit, 4:2:0 but we added some VFX layers and exported new footage as 10 bit QT files
- I converted the above 10-bit files to ProRes 422 HQ for editing
- My FCP 7.03 sequence set to Render ALL YUV in high precision YUV
- Before exporting I set sequence to uncompressed 10-bit
- I have tried exporting as self-contained QT movie or sending to Compressor and get identical results either way
- Hardware is Intel MacPro, 8-processors, 12 GB RAM
The problematic scene is in a desert and has some blown-out highlights, especially on the chrome trim of a car and some snow-capped mountains in the background. That scene looks fine in my FCP timeline – the aforementioned highlights are certainly hot, but no weird color smears.
But when I output to either uncompressed or ProRes 422HQ, the highlights get smeared with pixellated rainbow colors, like some 8-bit Atari video game. When I output to H.264, no smearing, the footage looks as good as it does in my FCP timeline.
What could be causing this and how could I get around it? I don’t want to send H.264 compressed footage to the colorist.
I would upload some frame-grabs, but I’m not authorized as clip contains some name actors and producers would not be happy.
Any input much appreciated!

