• Adobe Media Encoder

  [h264] AME vs Xmedia Recode

  Posted by Michel Domaine on September 16, 2015 at 10:50 am

  Hi everybody,

  I’m quite impressed about a test I have done and I just want to ask your opinion about that.

  I was trying to compress a 53′ documentary of mine in the best quality and less weight possible and I tried Xmedia Recode.
  I started from a dnxhd intermediate version.
  The film is quite grainy (my choice) and I could see easily how the compression worked looking to the artifacts and the details on the noise grain.

  Well, what I found is that the h264 that I’ve done to 5mbps with Xmediarecode (1,9 Gb) is better that a 16mbps (6gb) h264 version I did before with Adobe Media Encoder.
  Actually with Xmediarecode I could change a lot of parameters to improve the compression but the difference looked crazy to me.

  Everyone else notice this difference and what do you think?

  Michel Domaine replied 10 years, 8 months ago 1 Member · 0 Replies
• 0 Replies

Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up