• Adobe Media Encoder

  [h264] AME vs Xmedia Recode

  Posted by Michel Domaine on September 16, 2015 at 10:50 am

  Hi everybody,

  I’m quite impressed about a test I have done and I just want to ask your opinion about that.

  I was trying to compress a 53′ documentary of mine in the best quality and less weight possible and I tried Xmedia Recode.
  I started from a dnxhd intermediate version.
  The film is quite grainy (my choice) and I could see easily how the compression worked looking to the artifacts and the details on the noise grain.

  Well, what I found is that the h264 that I’ve done to 5mbps with Xmediarecode (1,9 Gb) is better that a 16mbps (6gb) h264 version I did before with Adobe Media Encoder.
  Actually with Xmediarecode I could change a lot of parameters to improve the compression but the difference looked crazy to me.

  Everyone else notice this difference and what do you think?

  Michel Domaine replied 10 years, 11 months ago 1 Member · 0 Replies
• 0 Replies

Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up