Activity › Forums › JVC Cameras › gy-hm100u
-
gy-hm100u
Posted by Dan Asselin on January 31, 2011 at 7:58 pmHi; I am in the process of researching the purchase of a GY-HM100U and as part of that research i downloaded some footage from the JVC Canada website. I love how the camera seems to handle colors and sharpness but any motion at all seems to be a blur. If you look at the front leg of the moose photo here you will see that during even a slow walk the leg is almost a total blur. I would assume that they would only use the best footage possible to sell their cameras so does anyone have an idea what the problem is?
Phil Balsdon replied 15 years, 3 months ago 6 Members · 10 Replies -
10 Replies
-
Mark Petereit
January 31, 2011 at 10:21 pmWould you buy a car based on seeing one commercial on TV?
-
Dan Asselin
January 31, 2011 at 10:27 pmNo but I might NOT buy a car if that commercial showed a problem
-
Andy Urtusuastegui
February 2, 2011 at 11:19 pmI have a hm100u. Very nice camera for the size.
It will depend on frame rate and shutter speed.
I have found that the camera performs better at 720p modes.
I shoot 720 60p. I use a shutter of 1/100 or 1/250 and I get sharp movement. -
Jeffrey Carter
February 4, 2011 at 10:24 pmI’ve been shooting for over a month with the camera, and haven’t noticed any blurring or motion issues. Outside, you’ll probably be above a 1/60th shutter because of 1 ND filter setting and everything will be sharp. Indoors, you can get by with a 1/30 shutter. I rate the camera at 100 ASA (pretty low). Depends on what you want to shoot with it.
Here’s a real world sample: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG7cRS1li0w
and: https://www.youtube.com/user/ateamvideo321?feature=mhum#p/a/u/1/KbhNE620jHc
there’s plenty more out there. Philip Bloom does a nice review of the camera. I would stick to 720 30p or 60p, with detail set to OFF.
The zoom and controls leave a lot to be desired, but it has very good quality for shooting for the web. I did a two camera shoot with a HVX200, both at 9db gain, and I think the HM100 looks better – despite the better DVCPRO HD100 codec of the Panasonic.
Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.
-
Charlie Cogar
February 7, 2011 at 7:27 pmA very nice sample. Thanks.
I just got a 100 and shot some outdoor test footage in a variety of lighting conditions. The results are fine (no blurring).
What brand and size SDHC cards are you using?
Where is the Philip Bloom review?
-
Jeffrey Carter
February 7, 2011 at 10:38 pmI use 16gb Transcend class 6 cards with no problems, and PNY class 10. The Transcend cards are $26 at B&H! That’s cheaper then Betacam Tapes back in the ’90’s (1 hr @ card = 2 tapes @ $30). At that price you could keep shot footage on the cards and not re-use them.
Better to use 1 hour or less (16gb) cards for ease and speed of downloading and cataloging footage – but that’s a workflow issue.
Bloom’s review is here: https://philipbloom.net/2009/04/17/review-of-jvc-gy-hm-100/
Happy shooting!
-
Phil Balsdon
February 15, 2011 at 9:19 pmYou can’t judge a camera’s performance properly by footage downloaded from the web. It will be highly compressed and interframes introduced, this will particularly effect the way motion is played back.
I have a friend that uses this camera for corporate work. The results were so good one of his clients had a broadcast tvc made from material he shot.
Cinematographer, Steadicam Operator, Final Cut Pro Post Production.
https://www.steadi-onfilms.com.au/
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up
